Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... complaint filed by the Director of the Environmental Services Division , EPA Region II , was dismissed . On November ... complaints are reinstated , and the stay is vacated . Before Environmental Appeals Judges Ronald L. McCallum and ...
... complaint filed by the Director of the Environmental Services Division , EPA Region II , was dismissed . On November ... complaints are reinstated , and the stay is vacated . Before Environmental Appeals Judges Ronald L. McCallum and ...
Page 2
... complaint . On December 13 , 1991 , all proceedings in this matter were stayed pending resolution of the issue on interlocutory appeal . In light of the recent decision in 3M Company ( Minnesota Mining and Manufac- turing ) , TSCA ...
... complaint . On December 13 , 1991 , all proceedings in this matter were stayed pending resolution of the issue on interlocutory appeal . In light of the recent decision in 3M Company ( Minnesota Mining and Manufac- turing ) , TSCA ...
Page 16
... complaint alleging that Respondent B & B Wrecking and Excavating , Inc. violated TSCA Section 15 , 15 U.S.C. § 2614 , and the PCB disposal and marking regulations at 40 CFR Part 761. On January 23 , 1992 , the Presiding Officer issued a ...
... complaint alleging that Respondent B & B Wrecking and Excavating , Inc. violated TSCA Section 15 , 15 U.S.C. § 2614 , and the PCB disposal and marking regulations at 40 CFR Part 761. On January 23 , 1992 , the Presiding Officer issued a ...
Page 29
... complaint against ethlehem Steel Corporation for the assessment of administrative penalties under 16 ( a ) of the Toxic Substances Control Act , 15 U.S.C. §2615 ( a ) . On December 23 , 91 , Administrative Law Judge J. F. Greene granted ...
... complaint against ethlehem Steel Corporation for the assessment of administrative penalties under 16 ( a ) of the Toxic Substances Control Act , 15 U.S.C. §2615 ( a ) . On December 23 , 91 , Administrative Law Judge J. F. Greene granted ...
Page 30
... complaint , Respondent ar- gued that the complaint is barred by the general statute of limitations at 28 U.S.C. § 2462 , because it was filed more than five years after the date upon which the erroneous report was submitted . Respondent ...
... complaint , Respondent ar- gued that the complaint is barred by the general statute of limitations at 28 U.S.C. § 2462 , because it was filed more than five years after the date upon which the erroneous report was submitted . Respondent ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego