Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 15
... arguing that all of the treatment technologies to be used at the facility have been proven . With respect to the second concern , the Region argues that the permit as written is adequate to protect human health and the environment and ...
... arguing that all of the treatment technologies to be used at the facility have been proven . With respect to the second concern , the Region argues that the permit as written is adequate to protect human health and the environment and ...
Page 19
... argues that the permit improperly requires it to repeat the entire trial burn procedure as part of any reapplication ... argue that the permit improperly allows Chevron to burn 1 All wastes stored or treated at the facility are generated ...
... argues that the permit improperly requires it to repeat the entire trial burn procedure as part of any reapplication ... argue that the permit improperly allows Chevron to burn 1 All wastes stored or treated at the facility are generated ...
Page 42
... argues that the Regional Administrator should have granted an evi- dentiary hearing on the eleven issues discussed below . Mixing Zones : As noted above , the national effluent guidelines for gold placer mining impose a technology ...
... argues that the Regional Administrator should have granted an evi- dentiary hearing on the eleven issues discussed below . Mixing Zones : As noted above , the national effluent guidelines for gold placer mining impose a technology ...
Page 43
... argues that an effluent limitation that directly limits turbidity is unnecessary because the limitation on settleable solids will control turbidity sufficiently to meet the water quality standard . This argument was raised and rejected ...
... argues that an effluent limitation that directly limits turbidity is unnecessary because the limitation on settleable solids will control turbidity sufficiently to meet the water quality standard . This argument was raised and rejected ...
Page 46
... argues that it is not challenging the regulation itself , but the manner in which the regulation has been applied in the permit . The Region responds that MAC has not preserved this issue for review because , although it was raised ...
... argues that it is not challenging the regulation itself , but the manner in which the regulation has been applied in the permit . The Region responds that MAC has not preserved this issue for review because , although it was raised ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego