...British Columbia. Substantial damages were awarded. This arbitration is an authority for the principle that no State has the right "to use or permit the...injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the property or persons thereon." The irreparable damage done to Japanese fishermen and property...

...that, "under the principles of international law, as well as of the law of the United States, no nation has the right to use or permit the use of its territory...injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the property of persons therein."181 Thus it can be concluded that there is a general international...

...that, "under the principles of international law, as well as of the law of the United States, no nation has the right to use or permit the use of its territory...injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the property of persons therein."181 Thus it can be concluded that there is a general international...

...caused by the Trail Smelter in British Columbia to property within the State of Washington. In this case the tribunal held that "no State has the right to...injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the properties or persons therein, when the case is of serious consequences and the injury is established...

...caused by the Trail Smelter in British Columbia to property within the State of Washington. In this case the tribunal held that "no State has the right to...injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the properties or persons therein, when the case is of serious consequences and the injury is established...

...that ". . . under the principles of international law, as well as of the law of the United States, no State has the right to use or permit the use of its territory in 59. In some cases a declaratory judgement, instead of merely declaring that the act or omission imputable...

...(1984), pp. 127 et seq. 138 In the Trail Smelter case, the tribunal declared that '...no State has a right to use or permit the use of its territory in...injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the properties or persons therein, when the case is of serious consequences and the injury is established...

...principle in various contexts. For example, in the Trail Smelter Arbitration (1941), the tribunal ruled that "no state has the right to use or permit the...its territory in such a manner as to cause injury ... in or to the territory of another or the properties or persons therein."33 Similarly, in the Corfu...

...concluded "that, under the principles of international law, as well as of the law of the United States, no state has the right to use or permit the use of its territory in such a manner as to cause inj ury by fumes in or to the territory of another or to property of persons therein ..." The Supreme...

...Tribunal stated that "under principles of international law, as well as the law of the United States, no state has the right to use or permit the use of territory in such a manner as to cause injury by fumes in or to the territory of another or the properties...