« PreviousContinue »
THE 1969 ECONOMIC REPORT
OF THE PRESIDENT
JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
STANFORD LAW LIBRARY
WITNESSES AND STATEMENTS
Patman, Hon. Wright, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee:
Javits, Hon. Jacob K., ranking minority member of the Joint Economic
Barr, Hon. Joseph W., Secretary of the Treasury.
Okun, Hon. Arthur M., Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS
Staff study: "Comparison of Budget Outlays and Tax Expenditures
by Function-Fiscal Year 1970"-
Supplementary statement: "Tax Expenditures-Government Ex-
Table 1. National Defense, Tax Expenditures, 1968-.
Table 2. International Affairs and Finance, Tax Expenditures,
Table 3. Agriculture and Agricultural Resources, Tax Expendi-
Table 4. Natural Resources, Tax Expenditures, 1968-
Table 5. Commerce and Transportation, Tax Expenditures, 1968-
Table 6. Community Development and Housing, Tax Expendi-
Table 7. Health and Welfare, Tax Expenditures, 1968-
Table 8. Education and Manpower, Tax Expenditures-
Table 9. Veterans Benefits and Services, Tax Expenditures, 1968-
Table 10. Aid to State and Local Government Financing, Tax
Charts and text: "The Fiscal Program for 1970 in Perspective".
Response to Chairman Patman query re high interest rates..
Response to request from Chairman Patman for comment re Urban
Response to Chairman Patman query re "realistic budget”.
Response to Chairman Patman's query re high interest rates..
Response to Chairman Patman's query re "realistic budget”.
Reply to Chairman Patman's query re increase in 1970 tax receipts.--
Javits, Hon. Jacob K.:
Editorial: "Unbalanced Budget Priorities," New York Times.
Treasury Department publication: "Maintaining the Strength of the
Response to Chairman Patman's query re high interest rates.-
Response to Chairman Patman's query re "realistic budget"
Material submitted in response to questioning by Representative
Rumsfeld re functional classification of budget_
Letter sent to New York Times replying to editorial "Unbalanced