Page images
PDF
EPUB

AID TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCING

The Federal Government aids State and local government financing through certain tax provisions. These take two forms: (1) the itemized deductions for nonbusiness State and local taxes; (2) the exemption from Federal income tax of interest on State and local government obligations. The revenue costs to the Federal Government of these special tax provisions are shown in Table 10. There is no single functional category in the present Federal budget for aid to State and local government financing, and thus there is no chart for this item.

CAPITAL GAINS

INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX

The tax expenditures involved in the present treatment of capital gains of individuals are placed in the range of $5.5 to $8.5 billion. This revenue cost includes the exclusion from income tax of appreciation on assets transferred at death, the exclusion of half the gains from the sale of capital assets held more than six months, and the maximum rate of 25 percent. No table or chart is shown for this heading, because these tax expenditures would fall under a variety of functions in the Federal budget, including commerce and transportation, agriculture and agricultural resources, community development and housing, and health and welfare. Available data, however, do not provide a basis for accurate distribution among these functions. Thus, to avoid having to choose any single predominant category but to identify the importance of this special provision, a new heading outside any budget classification is included for this item.

Separation of this item from the budget classifications leads to an understatement of the amounts of tax expenditures for the functional categories affected.

SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENT OF JOSEPH W. BARR

TAX EXPENDITURES: GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES MADE THROUGH THE INCOME TAX SYSTEM

The Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury for fiscal year 1968 includes an exhibit which presents Government expenditures for 1968 made through the income tax system (Exhibit 29). The availability of the budget for fiscal year 1970 enables us to present an updating of tax expenditures to cover the fiscal years 1968, 1969, and 1970 on a basis consistent with the 1970 budget data and classifications. The following statement is a condensed and revised version of the exhibit in the Secretary's 1968 Annual Report with the updated figures.

PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS

This analysis extends the budget to include Government expenditures made through the income tax system. The present Federal income tax structure contains a large number of special deductions, credits, exclusions, exemptions, and preferential rates designed to achieve various social and economic objectives. Most of these special provisions serve ends similar in nature to those served by direct Government expenditures or loan programs, and they affect the private economy in the same way. In a specific functional area the Government may have direct expenditures, direct Federal loans, Federal insurance or guarantees of private loans, and interest subsidies which represent alternative methods of accomplishing the purpose which the special tax provision seeks to achieve or encourage. This analysis, together with the fuller presentation in the Secretary's Annual Report, will permit a better understanding of the amount and allocation of resources on both the outlay and revenue side of the 1970 budget.

A tax expenditure has the same impact on the budget surplus or deficit as a direct increase in expenditures. The tax revenues which the Government does not collect because of these special tax provisions, however, are not reported in the budget as presently constituted. The absence of line items-either on the receipts or outlays side of the budget-for these revenue losses thus results in an understatement of the role of Federal Government financial influence on the behavior of individuals and businesses and on income distribution. In many areas the magitude of tax expenditures approaches and, in some instances, approximates direct outlays having the same objective.

Tax expenditures are not disclosed in the budget and therefore are not subject to careful annual scrutiny in the budget and appropriation process. Budget outlay decisions, on the other hand, involve the departments and agencies, the Bureau of the Budget, the House and Senate program committees which are competent and experienced in their specialized fields, and the appropriation committees. Tax expenditures are not generally considered by the program departments and congressional committees concerned, and are not reviewed annually or periodically to measure the benefits they achieve against the amounts expended. The purpose of this analysis is to present information which compares tax expenditures with direct expenditures or loan programs in various functional areas and thus to clarify and present more fully the role of the Federal Government in these areas Such a comparison should be helpful in the allocation of public resources.

A few illustrations will indicate how tax expenditures are alternatives to direct expenditures or Government lending programs. Under the functional category of health and welfare, the budget lists large direct expenditures which benefit the aged. In addition, $2.3 billion was expended in 1968 through the tax system to aid the elderly.

Direct expenditures for natural resources are itemized in the budget. To these should be added the $1.6 billion assistance the tax system provides these industries by permitting the expensing of certain capital costs, the use of percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion, and special capital gains treatment for iron ore and coal royalties.

In the field of housing the Government now provides direct subsidies to lower the interest rates on mortgages paid by buyers of certain homes. Homeownership is also subsidized through the tax deductions for interest paid on home mortgages and for property taxes on homes which now cost the Government annually about $1.9 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively.

SCOPE OF TAX EXPENDITURES

Some of the special tax provisions cause revenue to be lost to the Government forever because the current tax base or the tax rates are reduced without any offsetting increase later. Such tax expenditures correspond closely to direct expenditures.

Other special tax provisions serve to defer the time when the taxes will be paid. For a particular taxpayer, transaction, or asset, the special provision may really represent a deferral of tax. However, for stable or growing businesses with an indefinite life, for the Government, and for the entire economy, the deferral of taxes continues forever under most of these provisions; furthermore, in an expanding economy the aggregate amount of deferred taxes tends to grow year after year. Examples of special tax provisions which cause deferral of taxes include: Deduction of employer and self-employed contributions to private pension plans and exemption of investment income of such plans; accelerated depreciation deductions on buildings; net income reinvested in ship construction and renovation by certain shipping companies; expensing of capital costs in agriculture and natural resource industries; and exclusion of nonrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries.

Special tax provisions, which serve to defer but not forgive tax payments, might be compared to net lending in budget terminology. These special tax provisions are generally open-ended, with the extent and duration of their use largely at the taxpayers' option. For these reasons, the tax expenditure classifications in this analysis do not separate the special provisions which reduce taxes from those which defer taxes.

This analysis does not attempt a complete listing of all the special tax provisions. Various items have been excluded for one or more of several reasons:

(a) Some items were excluded because there is insufficient information available on which to base a sound estimate. For example, in the case of depreciation on machinery and equipment, accelerated tax methods may provide an allowance beyond that appropriate to the measurement of net income but it is difficult to measure that difference because the true economic deterioration or obsolescence factor cannot be readily determined.

(b) Some items were excluded where the case for their inclusion in the income base stands on relatively technical or theoretical tax arguments. The imputed rent on owner-occupied homes, for example, involves not only a conceptual problem but difficult practical problems of measurement.

(c) Some items were omitted because of their relatively small quantitative importance.

Other features of our income tax system are considered not as variations from the generally accepted measure of net income or as tax preferences but as a part of the structure of an income tax system based on ability to pay. Such features include personal exemptions and the rate schedules under the individual income tax.

It must be recognized that the exclusions from the listing are to some extent arbitrary. The objective of this analysis is to provide a list of items that would be generally recognized as an intended use of the tax system to achieve results which are now, or could be, achieved through direct Government expenditures. The design of this list seems best served by constructing a minimum list rather than including highly complicated or controversial items that would becloud the utility of this analysis.

TAX EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY

The tax expenditures resulting from the various special tax provisions are classified under the functional categories used in the budget. In most cases, particular special tax provisions which affect more than one budget category have been classified in the one where the effect is most important. In a few cases where the amount is large and the allocation relatively clear, the tax expenditures are divided between two functions.

No significant tax expenditures are made in three budget categories, space, interest, and general government and others. Two classes of tax expenditures (aid to State and local governments and capital gains individual) which involve large amounts have not been assigned to specific functional categories for the reasons given in those sections of the analysis.

All estimates of tax expenditures resulting from special tax provisions represent revenues lost on an annual basis. The estimates of revenue foregone are, in general, based on the assumption that such provisions never existed, or, alternatively, that such provisions have been withdrawn sufficiently long ago that we are now beyond the period needed to permit an equitable transition to a new tax situation.

The revenue cost estimated for these special provisions is not in many cases the revenue change which would result in the first full year if these provisions were withdrawn. Replacement of some or all of these provisions by direct expenditures or lending programs might change the level and composition of economic activity. The revenue cost of each special tax provision presented for 1968 would, of course, generally vary over time with growth in the economy and changes in various parts of the tax base. Also, a realistic approach to any change in these provisions would provide in many situations transition arrangements which would effect the revenue change gradually over a period of years.

Another key assumption is that economic activity for the year would not have been affected by the absence of these special provisions. This, of course, is a simplifying assumption for tax expenditures undoubtedly have significant effects on the composition and perhaps the level of economic activity. Also, in the absence of these tax benefits, there would doubtless have been changes in Government direct spending and net lending to accomplish some of the objectives of the existing provisions. No attempt has been made to speculate how the budget and the economy might differ if none of these provisions were in the law.

No account is taken here of other taxes, such as payroll taxes, estate and gift taxes, excises, or tariffs. The assumption inherent in current law, that corporations are separate entities and subject to income taxation independently from their shareholders, is adhered to in this analysis.

The tax expenditures shown here for the three fiscal years 1968, 1969, and 1970 are figured at the tax rate which affect the revenues in these years.

A brief description of each of the special tax provisions for which a tax expenditure estimate is shown accompanies the estimates.

National Defense

The supplements to salaries of military personnel by provision of quarters and meals on military bases and off-base quarters allowances for military families, and virtually all salary payments and reenlistment bonuses to military personnel serving in combat zones are excluded from tax.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Individual taxation.-For citizens of the United States, income earned abroad up to $20,000 for each complete tax year is exempted from taxation if the taxpayer is a bona fide resident of a foreign country for an uninterrupted period that includes 1 full tax year or, if he is present there 510 days during a period of 18 consecutive months. After 3 years, foreign resident taxpayers can exclude up to $25,000 a tax year.

United States citizens receiving from sources in a U. S. possession may, under certain conditions, exclude such income from tax.

Corporate taxation.-Domestic corporations which qualify as Western Hemisphere Trade Corporations are entitled to a special deduction which reduces their tax rate by 14 percentage points.

Income of foreign branches and subsidiaries of U. S. corporations is subject to taxation abroad and in the United States. A credit is allowed against U. S. income tax for the foreign income taxes paid, up to the amount of U. S. tax liability. U. S. corporations deriving income from foreign subsidiaries may claim a credit for foreign corporate profits tax deemed paid on that income, as well as for foreign taxes imposed directly on that income. If the subsidiary is in a developed country, the parent corporation must include both creditable foreign taxes in its U. S. taxable income; if the subsidiary is in a less developed country, the corporation need not "gross-up" its income to include the creditable portion of foreign profits tax.

United States corporations are not required currently to file consolidated returns which include the unrepatriated earnings of controlled foreign subsidiaries.

Domestic corporations deriving the bulk of their income in U. S. possessions may, under certain conditions, exclude such income from tax.

[blocks in formation]

Agriculture and Agricultural Resources

64

3.7

3.6

.9

.3

4.6

3.9

3.9

5.0

4.3

4.2

10

14

Farmers, including corporations, may deduct certain costs as current expenses even though these costs represent inventories on hand at the end of the year or capital improvements.

Capital gains treatment also extends to the sale of livestock, orchards, vineyards, and comparable agricultural activities.

The gain on the cutting of timber is taxed at the rates applicable to long-term capital gains, rather than at ordinary income rate.

TABLE 3.-AGRICULTURE AND AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES

Tax expenditures, 1968

[In millions of dollars)

Farming: Expensing and capital gains treatment..

Timber: Capital gains treatment for certain income..

Total tax expenditures.............

800

130

930

« PreviousContinue »