This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But I do not conceive that... Our Governmental Machine - Page 126by Schuyler Crawford Wallace - 1924 - 223 pagesFull view - About this book
| 1914 - 812 pages
...dissenting from the majority opinion in Lochner v. New York, 21 should prevail, and courts be held to have "nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law," written constitutions had better be avowedly and formally abolished, as bills of rights would then... | |
| Maryland State Bar Association - 1911 - 340 pages
..."This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...has nothing to do with the right of a majority to enact their opinion in law." He insists that the courts should not let the meaning of the liberty of... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1905 - 662 pages
...This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this court that state constitutions and state laws may regulate... | |
| 1905 - 1316 pages
...This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate... | |
| Frederick Pollock - 1905 - 480 pages
...'This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this Court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate... | |
| New York (State). Dept. of Labor - 1905 - 1094 pages
..."This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that rny agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1906 - 174 pages
...This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate... | |
| Charles Austin Beard - 1909 - 664 pages
...is decided upon an economic based upon theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement had nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various... | |
| National Conference on Social Welfare - 1910 - 716 pages
...: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country do not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this Court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate... | |
| Georgia Bar Association - 1910 - 404 pages
...opinion, says, "is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory,...to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinion in law. * * * * The fourteenth amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics.... | |
| |