Courts Crossing Borders: Blurring the Lines of SovereigntyLegal issues that have traditionally been treated as domestic are in-creasingly governed by transnational law and numerous obscure tri-bunals. This book acquaints students of law and politics with the largely unrecognized authority of transnational legal systems and the ways boundaries of national sovereignty are being eroded in the 21st century. The editors have skillfully organized their collection around issues dealing with both human rights and issues of trade and used a comparative approach to analyze the many court decisions, treaties, and legal agreements that affect national sovereignty. Included subject areas are: Courts and Regional Trade Agreements, Dispute Resolution under NAFTA, and Universal Criminal Jurisdiction. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 142
Moreover , the tribunals do not have explicit authority to reverse or dismiss a determination or decision of the CITT , SECOFI , or USITC . Rather , they may technically only either “ uphold a final determination ( on dumping or ...
Moreover , the tribunals do not have explicit authority to reverse or dismiss a determination or decision of the CITT , SECOFI , or USITC . Rather , they may technically only either “ uphold a final determination ( on dumping or ...
Page 147
Consequently , cases brought over AD and CVD agency determinations may result in two or more panel decisions . a Appeals ... materially affected the panel's decision and threatens the integrity of the binational panel review process .
Consequently , cases brought over AD and CVD agency determinations may result in two or more panel decisions . a Appeals ... materially affected the panel's decision and threatens the integrity of the binational panel review process .
Page 155
v . thus relied on the decision of the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal , in Stelco Inc. v . British Steel Canada Inc. , 25 an unreported decision , that observed : Given the discretionary nature of the Tribunal's decision - making ...
v . thus relied on the decision of the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal , in Stelco Inc. v . British Steel Canada Inc. , 25 an unreported decision , that observed : Given the discretionary nature of the Tribunal's decision - making ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Judicialization and Sovereignty Mary L Volcansek | 11 |
Transnational Courts | 17 |
Courts and Regional Trade Agreements Mary L Volcansek | 23 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
actors acts Advisory agreements American application Article authority binational panels challenge Chapter charges claim Commission committed Common Market Community constitutional Convention Court of Human Court of Justice created crimes against humanity decisions determination direct dispute resolution domestic economic effect enforcement environmental established Europe European Court European Union example final forced Former free trade Global Human Rights ICTY important individuals institutions Integration Inter-American interests International Criminal International Law issue Journal judges Judgment judicial jurisdiction Law Review limited Market measures movement NAFTA nature norms noted Opinion organizations Oxford Oxford University Press panel parties persons policies political principle prosecution protection provides question rape regime regional Relations reports requires result Review rules sentences sexual social sovereignty statute Stone Sweet Studies supranational tion tional transnational Treaty Trial Tribunal United violations violence women World York
Bibliographic information
| Title | Courts Crossing Borders: Blurring the Lines of Sovereignty |
| Editors | Mary L. Volcansek, John F. Stack |
| Publisher | Carolina Academic Press, 2005 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 28 Oct 2008 |
| ISBN | 1594600554, 9781594600555 |
| Length | 252 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |