The Federal Antitrust Laws: With Summary of Cases Instituted by the United States, 1890-1951Commerce Clearing House, 1952 - 461 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 124
... monopolize inter- state commerce in PORTLAND CEMENT . Because additional suits were filed in New York , Chicago , Kansas City , and Denver , against practically the same defendants , no further action was taken in this case . A nolle ...
... monopolize inter- state commerce in PORTLAND CEMENT . Because additional suits were filed in New York , Chicago , Kansas City , and Denver , against practically the same defendants , no further action was taken in this case . A nolle ...
Page 129
... monopolize interstate commerce in HAY . The indictment was dismissed on March 6 , 1923 , on motion of the govern- ment . 250. United States v . National Enameling & Stamping Co. , Eq . 23-126 : Petition under the Sherman Act filed ...
... monopolize interstate commerce in HAY . The indictment was dismissed on March 6 , 1923 , on motion of the govern- ment . 250. United States v . National Enameling & Stamping Co. , Eq . 23-126 : Petition under the Sherman Act filed ...
Page 298
... monopolize interstate com- merce incident to the fire insurance business in that area . An order of nolle prosequi was entered January 28 , 1943 , as to three defendants . On August 5 , 1943 , the court sustained demurrers to the ...
... monopolize interstate com- merce incident to the fire insurance business in that area . An order of nolle prosequi was entered January 28 , 1943 , as to three defendants . On August 5 , 1943 , the court sustained demurrers to the ...
Contents
Part ILaw Texts | 7 |
Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 59 | 18 |
Indexes | 21 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreements alleges that defendants alleging a combination alleging a conspiracy Ass'n CCH Trade Regulation charges that defendants charging a combination charging a conspiracy Circuit Court Civil Clayton Act combination and conspiracy Company complaint alleges Complaint under Sections consent decree consent judgment conspiracy in restraint conspiracy to restrain Court N. D. Ill Court S. D. Calif dealers December 17 decree was entered defendants pleaded nolo demurrers District Court N. D. District Court S. D. N. Y. enjoining the further February February 14 fix prices further operation guilty imposed indictment charges Indictment under Section individual defendants January January 12 jobbers June 29 lumber March March 21 monopolize interstate motion nolle prosequi November October patents perpetually enjoining petition pleaded nolo contendere prosequi was entered remaining defendants restraint of interstate retail Sherman Act filed Sherman Act returned Stat Supp Supreme Court tion trade and commerce Trade Regulation Reports United wholesale