The Federal Antitrust Laws: With Summary of Cases Instituted by the United States, 1890-1951Commerce Clearing House, 1952 - 461 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 88
... defendants pleaded nolo contendere and fines aggregating $ 13,700 were imposed on various dates from July 25 to September 14 , 1911 ( 1 D. & J. 762 ) . 88b . United States v . William P. Palmer : Indictment under the Sherman Act ...
... defendants pleaded nolo contendere and fines aggregating $ 13,700 were imposed on various dates from July 25 to September 14 , 1911 ( 1 D. & J. 762 ) . 88b . United States v . William P. Palmer : Indictment under the Sherman Act ...
Page 142
... defendant pleaded guilty and a fine of $ 1,000 was imposed . After demurrers to the indictment had been overruled on December 18 , 1925 , the remaining defendants pleaded not guilty on January 18 , 1926. The case was consolidated for ...
... defendant pleaded guilty and a fine of $ 1,000 was imposed . After demurrers to the indictment had been overruled on December 18 , 1925 , the remaining defendants pleaded not guilty on January 18 , 1926. The case was consolidated for ...
Page 259
... defendants pleaded nolo contendere before trial , which commenced February 17 , 1942. The other defendants waived a jury . During trial the Government dismissed count one as to all except two defendants , and dismissed count two as to ...
... defendants pleaded nolo contendere before trial , which commenced February 17 , 1942. The other defendants waived a jury . During trial the Government dismissed count one as to all except two defendants , and dismissed count two as to ...
Contents
Part ILaw Texts | 7 |
Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 59 | 18 |
Indexes | 21 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreements alleges that defendants alleging a combination alleging a conspiracy Ass'n CCH Trade Regulation charges that defendants charging a combination charging a conspiracy Circuit Court Civil Clayton Act combination and conspiracy Company complaint alleges Complaint under Sections consent decree consent judgment conspiracy in restraint conspiracy to restrain Court N. D. Ill Court S. D. Calif dealers December 17 decree was entered defendants pleaded nolo demurrers District Court N. D. District Court S. D. N. Y. enjoining the further February February 14 fix prices further operation guilty imposed indictment charges Indictment under Section individual defendants January January 12 jobbers June 29 lumber March March 21 monopolize interstate motion nolle prosequi November October patents perpetually enjoining petition pleaded nolo contendere prosequi was entered remaining defendants restraint of interstate retail Sherman Act filed Sherman Act returned Stat Supp Supreme Court tion trade and commerce Trade Regulation Reports United wholesale