The Federal Antitrust Laws: With Summary of Cases Instituted by the United States, 1890-1951Commerce Clearing House, 1952 - 461 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 94
Page 76
... Sherman Act returned July 12 , 1906 , in the Supreme Court ( D. C. ) against the American Ice Company and others , charging an agreement to control prices and restrain competition in the sale of ICE within the District of Columbia . A ...
... Sherman Act returned July 12 , 1906 , in the Supreme Court ( D. C. ) against the American Ice Company and others , charging an agreement to control prices and restrain competition in the sale of ICE within the District of Columbia . A ...
Page 88
... Sherman Act returned June 29 , 1911 , in the Circuit Court ( S. D. N. Y. ) against Palmer and thirty - eight others constituting the RUBBER COVERED WIRE Association , charging the operation of a pool to fix prices and to apportion ...
... Sherman Act returned June 29 , 1911 , in the Circuit Court ( S. D. N. Y. ) against Palmer and thirty - eight others constituting the RUBBER COVERED WIRE Association , charging the operation of a pool to fix prices and to apportion ...
Page 107
... bill in equity . ( See No. 204. ) 160. United States v . Daniel P. Collins , Cr . 29922 : Indictment under the Sherman Act returned September 4 , 1914 , in the Supreme Court ( D. C. ) against Collins and thirty other commission ...
... bill in equity . ( See No. 204. ) 160. United States v . Daniel P. Collins , Cr . 29922 : Indictment under the Sherman Act returned September 4 , 1914 , in the Supreme Court ( D. C. ) against Collins and thirty other commission ...
Contents
Part ILaw Texts | 7 |
Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 59 | 18 |
Indexes | 21 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreements alleges that defendants alleging a combination alleging a conspiracy Ass'n CCH Trade Regulation charges that defendants charging a combination charging a conspiracy Circuit Court Civil Clayton Act combination and conspiracy Company complaint alleges Complaint under Sections consent decree consent judgment conspiracy in restraint conspiracy to restrain Court N. D. Ill Court S. D. Calif dealers December 17 decree was entered defendants pleaded nolo demurrers District Court N. D. District Court S. D. N. Y. enjoining the further February February 14 fix prices further operation guilty imposed indictment charges Indictment under Section individual defendants January January 12 jobbers June 29 lumber March March 21 monopolize interstate motion nolle prosequi November October patents perpetually enjoining petition pleaded nolo contendere prosequi was entered remaining defendants restraint of interstate retail Sherman Act filed Sherman Act returned Stat Supp Supreme Court tion trade and commerce Trade Regulation Reports United wholesale