Page images
PDF
EPUB

EXPLORATIONS AND SURVEYS IN DIVISIONS AND DEPARTMENTS.

REPORT OF CAPT. WILLIAM L. MARSHALL, CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
Explorations and surveys in the division of the Missouri...

2875

REPORT OF LIEUT. FAYETTE W. ROE, THIRD INFANTRY.

Explorations and surveys in the Department of the Platte

2877

REPORT OF LIEUT. LEONARD A. LOVERING, FOURTH INFANTRY.
Explorations and surveys in the Department of the Columbia..
REPORT OF LIEUT. JAMES E. RUNCIE, FIRST ARTILLERY.
Explorations and surveys in the division of the Pacific...

2878

2879

[blocks in formation]

REPORT

OF

LIBRARY

THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS,

UNITED STATES ARMY.

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS,

UNITED STATES ARMY,
Washington, D. C., September 30, 1889.

SIR: I have the honor to present for your information the following report upon the duties and operations of the Engineer Department for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1889:

OFFICERS OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.

The number of officers holding commissions in the Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army, at the end of the fiscal year was 109.

Six additional second lieutenants have been added to the Corps by appointment from the Military Academy, to date from June 12, 1889, but they did not become available for duty until after the close of the fiscal year, and are, therefore, not included in the strength of the Corps. On the 30th of June, 1889, the officers were distributed as follows:

Office Chief of Engineers

Office Chief of Engineers, fortifications, and river and harbor works
Fortifications and river and harbor works

3

1

16

Fortifications, river and harbor works, and division engineer..

1

Fortifications, river and harbor works, and Board of Engineers.
River and harbor works....

37

Division engineer and Board of Engineers

Division engineer, Board of Engineers, Board of Visitors, and Mississippi River
Commission

1

Mississippi River Commission

1

Mississippi River Commission and Missouri River Commission
Public buildings and grounds and Washington Aqueduct

Washington Aqueduct

1

Post of Willets Point, Engineer School of Application, and Battalion of Engineers

1

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Incapacitated for active service and on indefinite leave of absence
Detached, on duty with Light-House Establishment, at Military Academy,
with Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, with the Missouri
River Commission, at U. S. Infantry and Cavalry School, and as Military
Attaché

1

20

3

The officers detached were on duty as follows:

Col. John G. Parke, Superintendent Military Academy until June 24, 1889.
Maj. David P. Heaf, engineer third light-house district...

Maj. Charles W. Raymond, Engineer Commissioner of the District of Columbia.
Maj. William S. Stanton, engineer first and second light-house districts..
Maj. James F. Gregory, engineer secretary of the Light-House Board..
Cap. John C. Mallery, engineer fifth and sixth light-house districts..
Capt. Edward Maguire, engineer fourth light-house district...
Capt. John G. D. Knight, instructor of engineering at the U. S. Infantry and
Cavalry School

1

1

1

1

1

1

Capts. Thomas W. Symons and James L. Lusk, assistants to the Engineer Commissioner of the District of Columbia...

2

Capt. George McC. Derby and Lieut. John Biddle, on duty with Company E,
Battalion of Engineers, and at the Military Academy..

2

Lieut. Theodore A. Bingham, secretary and disbursing officer of the Missouri
River Commission...

Lieut. Hiram M. Chittenden, on duty with the Missouri River Commission..
Lieuts. George W. Goethals, Harry F. Hodges, Eugene J. Spencer, and Irving
Hale, on duty at the Military Academy.

Lieut. John Millis, assistant to engineer third light-house district...
Lieut. James C. Sanford, Military Attaché to U. S. Legation at Berlin..

1

1

4

1

SEA-COAST DEFENSES.

20

The permanent defenses of the country remain in the same inefficient condition that has obtained since the close of the civil war. No appropriation for new construction has been made since that of February 10, 1875. The act of September 22, 1888, appropriated $100,000 for the protection, preservation, and repair of existing works. This has been expended or pledged for such minor repairs as have appeared most necessary and for the care of the defenses. The act of March 2, 1889, appropriated $100,000 for the same purpose for the current fiscal year, and this appropriation will be exhausted at its close. These two appro priations have been carefully allotted among the several works according to their needs, and only the repairs most urgently required have been considered. Many of these works are still of value in connection with new works projected, and the estimate submitted is for their protection, preservation, and repair.

Our country, great in population, wealth, and natural resources, prominent among the nations of the earth in intelligence, ingenuity, and energy, and with an overflowing treasury, is absolutely helpless against the attack of any third-rate power possessing modern iron-clad vessels armed with heavy rifled cannon.

It would appear unnecessary to present arguments to show the folly of continuing such a condition of affairs, or to prove the necessity of protecting our most important sea-ports and harbors by all the appliances known to the present state of the science and art of war.

The reports of my predecessors have fully and ably set forth our deplorable condition, and the reasons and means for bettering it. I call special attention to the annual reports of the Chief of Engineers for 1881, 1882, and 1884, and earnestly suggest a careful study of the facts and recommendations therein set forth.

The following extract from the Report of The Board of Engineers is presented here as bearing on this matter:

The necessity for immediately beginning the work of reconstructing our sea-coast defenses has been so fully demonstrated heretofore in the annual reports of the Chief of Engineers that no repetition of the arguments is called for here. The only valid reason for delay has been the lack of guns and the impossibility of fabricating in this

« PreviousContinue »