National Environmental Policy Act: Joint Hearings Before the Committee on Public Works and the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-second Congress, Second Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - 604 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 46
( Applicant's or proposer's evaluation ? Agency staff evaluation ? Opinion of another Federal agency ? Invited public comment ? ) . ( 2 ) Indicate : ( a ) who in the agency decisionmaking process is to make the initial assessment of ...
( Applicant's or proposer's evaluation ? Agency staff evaluation ? Opinion of another Federal agency ? Invited public comment ? ) . ( 2 ) Indicate : ( a ) who in the agency decisionmaking process is to make the initial assessment of ...
Page 74
Finally , the court declined to require the FPC or the applicant to pay the expenses incurred by the petitioners in challenging the authorizations . Lathan v . Volpe , 3 ERC 1362 ( 9th Cir . 11/15/71 ) . The court held that citizens ...
Finally , the court declined to require the FPC or the applicant to pay the expenses incurred by the petitioners in challenging the authorizations . Lathan v . Volpe , 3 ERC 1362 ( 9th Cir . 11/15/71 ) . The court held that citizens ...
Page 76
However , the court refused to order the Corps to grant a permit for limestone mining in Lake Okeechobee because of environmental danger and because other remedies were available to protect the applicant's financial interests .
However , the court refused to order the Corps to grant a permit for limestone mining in Lake Okeechobee because of environmental danger and because other remedies were available to protect the applicant's financial interests .
Page 83
The Kalur decision requires the Corps of Engineers to comply with NEPA in its Refuse Act permit program and the Greene County decision requires the Corps to prepare each impact statement internally independent of the applicant .
The Kalur decision requires the Corps of Engineers to comply with NEPA in its Refuse Act permit program and the Greene County decision requires the Corps to prepare each impact statement internally independent of the applicant .
Page 128
AEC Applicant Estimated date final environmental statement to be issued Date safety evaluation report issued Utility and location Current status Arkansas 1 ( 850 MWE ) . Arkansas Power & Light Co. Not scheduled .. Not scheduled .
AEC Applicant Estimated date final environmental statement to be issued Date safety evaluation report issued Utility and location Current status Arkansas 1 ( 850 MWE ) . Arkansas Power & Light Co. Not scheduled .. Not scheduled .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addition administrative agency alternatives amendment analysis appeals applicant authority balancing capacity Chairman Commission Committee completed concerned Congress consider consideration construction Control Corps costs court decision delays Department detailed determination discharge discussion draft effects electric energy environment environmental impact Environmental Quality environmental statement existing facilities factors Federal Federal agencies final fuel further Government guidelines hearings impact statement implementation important interest Interior involved issues Keowee Lake land legislation license limited major March matter ment Natural NEPA nuclear Oconee operation percent period permit planning plant Policy Pollution possible prepared present problem procedures proposed question reasons regulations reserve responsibility result River Senator BAKER Service specific staff standards Station temperature tion units utility waste water quality
Popular passages
Page 413 - State and local governments, and other concerned public and private organizations, to use all practicable means and measures, including financial and technical assistance, in a manner calculated to foster and promote the general welfare, to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans.
Page 82 - ... i. the environmental impact of the proposed action, ii. any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, iii. alternatives to the proposed action, iv. the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and v. any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented.
Page 6 - Americans safe, healthful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings; (3) attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences ; (4) preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage, and maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice...
Page 364 - ... identify and develop methods and procedures, in consultation with the Council on Environmental Quality established by title II of this Act, which will insure that presently unquantified environmental amenities and values may be given appropriate consideration in decisionmaking along with economic and technical considerations...
Page 8 - ... to appraise programs and activities of the Federal Government in the light of the policy...
Page 82 - Nothing in Section 102 or 103 shall in any way affect the specific statutory obligations of any Federal agency (1) to comply with criteria or standards of environmental quality, (2) to coordinate or consult with any other Federal or State agency...
Page 8 - ... make available to States, counties, municipalities, institutions, and individuals, advice and information useful in restoring, maintaining, and enhancing the quality of the environment ; (G) initiate and utilize ecological information in the planning and development of resource-oriented projects; and (H) assist the Council on Environmental Quality established by title II of this Act.
Page 9 - Report required by section 201 of this title; (2) to gather timely and authoritative information concerning the conditions and trends in the quality of the environment...
Page 81 - The Congress authorizes and directs that, to the fullest extent possible: (1) the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this chapter, and (2) all agencies of the Federal Government shall...
Page 63 - To the maximum extent practicable no administrative action subject to section 102(2) (C) is to be taken sooner than ninety (90) days after a draft environmental statement has been circulated for comment, furnished to the Council and, except where advance public disclosure will result in significantly increased costs of procurement to the Government, made available to the public pursuant to these guidelines ; neither should such administrative action be taken sooner than thirty (30) days after the...