ANALYSIS OF SCHEDULE FOR NUCLEAR POWERPLANTS PENDING OPERATING LICENSES-Continued

Date safety
evaluation
report issued

mental state-
ment to be
issued

Current status

been no fuel loading or testing at low power.

June 1973 (esti- January 1973.
mate).
do..
February 23,
1972.

do.

Hearings on radiological issue
scheduled for March 1972.
No environmental hearings
are required. If favorable
decision reached, license
could be issued when con-
struction is complete and
commercial power could be
produced in July. No request
for a low power license has
been received.

The construction schedule for
this plant has slipped.
Hearings on radiological issues
requested. No environmental
hearings required. A request
for a 20-percent power license
has been received. Considera-
tion of the request is to be
based on the draft environ-
mental statement which has
already been issued.
Hearing on radiological issues
requested. No environmental
hearings required. If con-
struction is completed on
schedule, commercial power
could be available in
November.

A ministatement for 1-percent
power was developed. Radio-
logical hearings for 1-percent
testing license complete.
Hearings expected to resume
in March on full power
license.

September 1972. September 1972.

Due to fire, Indian Point No. 2 will not be ready for operation until April 1972.

& Set

Senator BAKER. Dr. Schlesinger, I apologize to you for the way with which we proceeded with your testimony this morning.

I have not yet had an opportunity to read your full statement, and I wonder if you would be willing to keep the record open for written questions.

Dr. SCHLESINGER. Yes, sir.

One other thing in response to Senator Gravel's question, I think if the committee permits, I will supply him the mini-NEPA review for Quad Cities so that the members of the committee can have a chance to examine that.

Senator BAKER. Thank you very much, doctor.

(The mini-review referred to appears on p. 133.)

Dr. SCHLESINGER. Mr. Chairman, I have two reports I would like made a part of the record, one is discussion and conclusions by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Divisions of Radiological and Environmental Protection and Reactor Licensing.

The other report is a draft detailed statement on the environmental considerations by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Division of Radiological and Environmental Protection related to the proposed issuance of an operating license to the Duke Power Co. for the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1.

Senator BAKER. Without objection those two reports will be made a part of the record.

(The reports referred to follow :)