Cases in Communication LawPaul Siegel paul siegel, 2008 - 321 pages Of the sixty-one cases represented in the second edition of Paul Siegel's popular Cases in Communication Law, forty-one are U. S. Supreme Court decisions, eleven are federal appellate decisions, and four were decided at the federal district court level. The book also includes five state cases. Twenty-two of the cases presented here are new to this edition, including Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, ABC v. Stewart, Solano v. Playgirl, and Amrak Productions v. Morton. Cases dropped from the first edition will be made available on an author-maintained website. This casebook can be used separately or as a companion to Siegel's Communication Law in America. |
Contents
First Amendment Principles | 8 |
123 | 21 |
Ceballos | 31 |
CommonLaw Principles | 43 |
Constitutional Considerations | 63 |
Invasion of Privacy | 89 |
Copyright and Trademark | 111 |
Access to Government Information | 141 |
Reporting on the Judiciary | 161 |
Protecting News Sources | 191 |
Regulation of Advertising | 213 |
Sexually Oriented Speech | 235 |
Broadcast and Cable TV Regulation | 261 |
The Internet | 295 |
About the Author 321 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action actual advertising Amendment Appeals applied argues authority broadcast cable called charges child claim Commission communication concern conclude conduct Congress consider constitutional contained copies Court of Appeals created criminal damages decision defendants DISCUSSION distribution District Court effect evidence existing expression fact fair false federal filed further hearing held hold important individual infringement interest involved issue judge judgment jurors jury Justice limited material matter meaning ment newspaper obscene official opinion original permit person petitioner photograph plaintiff POINTS political present privilege proceedings produce prohibits promotional protection published question reasonable record regulations reporters requested requires respondent rule selection serve Service sexual showing speech statements stations statute substantial suggest Supreme Court term tion trial users violation