Page images
PDF
EPUB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

PROPOSED TRADE REGULATION
RULE CONCERNING THE

ADVERTISING OF OPHTHALMIC
GOODS AND SERVICES

Proposed 16 CFR Part 456

COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION

RELATING TO PROPOSED TRADE REGULATION

RULE CONCERNING THE ADVERTISING OF
OPHTHALMIC GOODS AND SERVICES

May 10, 1976

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION
RELATING TO PROPOSED TRADE REGULATION
RULE CONCERNING THE ADVERTISING OF
OPHTHALMIC GOODS AND SERVICES

These comments are submitted on behalf of the American

Optometric Association ("AOA") in response to the Federal Trade Commission's invitation to comment on the proposed trade regulation rule concerning the advertising of ophthalmic goods and services published in the January 16, 1976 Federal Register (41 F.R. 2399). The comments include data and summarize AOA's position concerning issues of fact, law or policy bearing upon the proposed rule, the designated issues published in the April 2, 1976 Federal Register (41 F.R. 14194), and other matters referred to in the Initial Notice of proposed rulemaking. AOA intends to provide additional information and views

by testimony and exhibits at the public hearings which presently are scheduled to be held as a part of this proceeding.

AOA vigorously opposes the adoption of the proposed trade regulation rule. It is AOA's position that the Commission lacks legal authority to promulgate a rule which would preempt the statutes and regulations of the overwhelming majority of the States prohibiting or restricting the advertising of ophthalmic goods and services.

AOA has separately submitted

a motion to dismiss this rulemaking proceeding, accompanied by a legal memorandum in support thereof which shows that, under the applicable legal standards, the Commission does not have authority to override such state health care laws.

Apart from the Commission's lack of legal authority-which AOA's separate memorandum abundantly establishes--the proposed rule should not be implemented because it is contrary to the public interest and contrary to long-standing and wellestablished concepts of the public health and welfare.

For reasons which will be discussed herein and at the

hearings, it is AOA's position that State restrictions on the advertising of health care services and materials cannot properly be regarded as "unfair acts and practices"; instead, such

restrictions have been fashioned, in the light of existing

conditions within each State, in order to protect patients

against the evils and abuses of such advertising, and to pro

mote and assure the quality of health care services and

materials.

Indeed, the proposed rule represents a fundamen

tal, and unwarranted, departure from the clear national policy that matters of this nature shall be determined by the States,

and that State regulation of health care advertising is a

valid and proper exercise of a State's police power.

Under all the circumstances, AOA strongly urges that the Commission should not adopt the proposed rule.

A.

AOA's Special Interest In This Proceeding

AOA is a national, non-profit professional association

of more than 19,500 members, consisting of Doctors of Optometry, optometry educators and students. It is estimated that optometrists treat approximately 70% of the patients in this country seeking vision care, and our members, who constitute the great majority of the practising optometrists, have a personal and immediate responsibility for their patients' visual health. AOA is dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of the visual health of the public, and AOA's objects, as stated in its constitution, "are to improve the vision care and health of the public and to promote the art and science of the profession of optometry".

« PreviousContinue »