« PreviousContinue »
Major Issues to consider
You may wish to consider the following issues or concerns regarding recreation fees at Thursday's hearing.
How valid is the Administration's (and other's) view that users of federal recreation lands should pay a larger share?
Is this concept more applicable to user fees such as
How much of a burden should the visitor bear? The Senate Budget Resolution comtemplates 25 percent. Is that not enough or too much? How does one determine such a figure?
Do other users of the federal lands (e.g. those who graze cattle, or cut timber, etc.) also bear a fair share of the costs associated with the federal investment in those activities?
Level of Fees
Assuming that fees are increased, how much of an increase
Although entrance fees are frozen, user fees are not. Since FY 1980, user fees have increased from $19,644,600 to $35,058,750 in FY 1984 a 44% increase. How much more should these fees be increased?
National Park entrance fees which are frozen at 1979 levels currently total approximately $8.2 million and range from $0.50 to $3.00 per vehicle. How much additional revenue should these fees bring in? How fast should they rise, if at all? Is it reasonable to charge the public $3.00 - $6.00 per vehicle to drive into a park and spend only a few hours?
Should a new fee policy be implemented with new authority for higher fees, how do Congress and the agencies ensure that OMB won't use this new authority as a means to make unrealistic budget assumptions and demands for higher and higher levels of revenue?
How Should The Fees Be Used
Once collected, how should the fee revenues be used?
Admission Fees for Forest Service and BLM Lands
Without huge park entrance and user fee increases, the
Should you have any questions about the upcoming hearing or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 4-7145.