United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 480Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1990 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 99
Page 1
... operation conflicts with the Alabama statute's mandatory operation . Furthermore , the purposes underlying Rule 38 - to penalize frivolous appeals and to compensate injured appellees for the delay and added expense inherent therein ...
... operation conflicts with the Alabama statute's mandatory operation . Furthermore , the purposes underlying Rule 38 - to penalize frivolous appeals and to compensate injured appellees for the delay and added expense inherent therein ...
Page 4
... operation conflict with the purposes and operation of Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure , and therefore that the statute should not be ap- plied by federal courts sitting in diversity . Entitled " Dam- ages for delay ...
... operation conflict with the purposes and operation of Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure , and therefore that the statute should not be ap- plied by federal courts sitting in diversity . Entitled " Dam- ages for delay ...
Page 6
... operation of the Federal Rule , compared to the mandatory operation of the Mississippi statute , and ( 2 ) the limited effect of the Rule in penalizing only frivolous ap- peals or appeals interposed for purposes of delay , compared to ...
... operation of the Federal Rule , compared to the mandatory operation of the Mississippi statute , and ( 2 ) the limited effect of the Rule in penalizing only frivolous ap- peals or appeals interposed for purposes of delay , compared to ...
Page 7
... operation unmistakably conflicts with the mandatory provision of Ala- bama's affirmance penalty statute . Moreover , the purposes underlying the Rule are sufficiently coextensive with the as- serted purposes of the Alabama statute to ...
... operation unmistakably conflicts with the mandatory provision of Ala- bama's affirmance penalty statute . Moreover , the purposes underlying the Rule are sufficiently coextensive with the as- serted purposes of the Alabama statute to ...
Page 8
... operation . Whatever circumscriptive effect the manda- tory affirmance penalty statute may have on the state court's exercise of discretion under Alabama's Rule 38 , that Rule provides no authority for defining the scope of discretion ...
... operation . Whatever circumscriptive effect the manda- tory affirmance penalty statute may have on the state court's exercise of discretion under Alabama's Rule 38 , that Rule provides no authority for defining the scope of discretion ...
Contents
xlvi | |
6 | |
13 | |
21 | |
29 | |
34 | |
52 | |
59 | |
411 | |
423 | |
432 | |
444 | |
451 | |
454 | |
467 | |
488 | |
66 | |
67 | |
71 | |
78 | |
90 | |
92 | |
98 | |
100 | |
111 | |
117 | |
142 | |
145 | |
146 | |
154 | |
160 | |
162 | |
167 | |
170 | |
174 | |
175 | |
187 | |
193 | |
209 | |
210 | |
214 | |
215 | |
217 | |
225 | |
245 | |
253 | |
255 | |
259 | |
264 | |
276 | |
279 | |
284 | |
286 | |
300 | |
308 | |
309 | |
313 | |
330 | |
337 | |
338 | |
351 | |
354 | |
360 | |
371 | |
375 | |
384 | |
390 | |
491 | |
492 | |
498 | |
500 | |
506 | |
508 | |
524 | |
526 | |
527 | |
531 | |
536 | |
543 | |
550 | |
562 | |
566 | |
604 | |
611 | |
612 | |
618 | |
618 | |
618 | |
629 | |
632 | |
640 | |
648 | |
652 | |
665 | |
671 | |
677 | |
681 | |
684 | |
690 | |
707 | |
709 | |
719 | |
726 | |
740 | |
5 | |
8 | |
3 | |
5 | |
7 | |
1 | |
3 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmative affirmative action Agency amici curiae applied argued the cause Asahi Attorney authority BLACKMUN BRENNAN brief California Certiorari denied Cheng Shin claim coal Coastal Commission concurring Confrontation Clause Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curtilage CZMA decision defendant discrimination dissenting 480 U. S. District Court Due Process Clause employees evidence exclusionary rule federal lands Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment gambling Granite Rock granted Indian interest issue judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE legislative McWebb ment minimum contacts National Farmers Union O'CONNOR officers Opinion Penn Central Transportation Pennsylvania permit requirement personal jurisdiction petitioner police POWELL pre-empted probable cause promotion protected provides question reasonable regulation remanded remedy respondent respondent's rule SCALIA standard Stat statute statutory STEVENS Subsidence Act Supp supra third floor tion Title VII trade or business trial Tribal Court United violation warrant
Popular passages
Page 279 - Individual with a disability means any person who: (i) Has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities; (ii) Has a record of such an impairment; or (iii) Is regarded as having such an impairment.
Page 380 - In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.
Page 355 - We therefore hold that government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.
Page 471 - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law.
Page 618 - It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
Page 176 - ... [t]he burden on a school board today is to come forward with a plan that promises realistically to work, and promises realistically to work now.
Page 5 - ... (b) Determination by court whenever joinder not feasible. If a person as described in subdivision (a) (l)-(2) hereof cannot be made a party, the court shall determine whether in equity and good conscience the action should proceed among the parties before it, or should be dismissed, the absent person being thus regarded as indispensable.
Page 427 - No Contracting State shall expel or return ("refouler") a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.