United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 480Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1990 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... consider the equal protection and due process challenges as well as the Erie claim . 475 U. S. 1080 ( 1986 ) . Because we conclude that the Alabama statute imposing a mandatory affirmance penalty has no application in federal diversity ...
... consider the equal protection and due process challenges as well as the Erie claim . 475 U. S. 1080 ( 1986 ) . Because we conclude that the Alabama statute imposing a mandatory affirmance penalty has no application in federal diversity ...
Page 10
... consider whether that suit should be stayed pending further tribal court proceedings or dis- missed under National Farmers Union's prudential rule . Pp . 19-20 . 774 F. 2d 1174 , reversed and remanded . MARSHALL , J. , delivered the ...
... consider whether that suit should be stayed pending further tribal court proceedings or dis- missed under National Farmers Union's prudential rule . Pp . 19-20 . 774 F. 2d 1174 , reversed and remanded . MARSHALL , J. , delivered the ...
Page 16
... consider the issues before them and " to rec- tify any errors . ' 471 U. S. , at 857. The federal policy of promoting tribal self - government encompasses the develop- 99 As the Court's directions on remand in National Farmers Union ...
... consider the issues before them and " to rec- tify any errors . ' 471 U. S. , at 857. The federal policy of promoting tribal self - government encompasses the develop- 99 As the Court's directions on remand in National Farmers Union ...
Page 20
... consider whether , on the facts of this case , the federal action should be stayed pending further Tribal Court proceedings or dismissed under the prudential rule announced in National Farmers Union . 9 Opinion of STEVENS , J. A federal ...
... consider whether , on the facts of this case , the federal action should be stayed pending further Tribal Court proceedings or dismissed under the prudential rule announced in National Farmers Union . 9 Opinion of STEVENS , J. A federal ...
Page 37
... Consider two single individuals filing for the tax year ending Decem- ber 31 , 1986 : A has $ 75,000 in nongambling income , and $ 75,000 in itemized nongambling deductions ; B , a full - time gambler , has $ 75,000 in gambling winnings ...
... Consider two single individuals filing for the tax year ending Decem- ber 31 , 1986 : A has $ 75,000 in nongambling income , and $ 75,000 in itemized nongambling deductions ; B , a full - time gambler , has $ 75,000 in gambling winnings ...
Contents
xlvi | |
6 | |
13 | |
21 | |
29 | |
34 | |
52 | |
59 | |
411 | |
423 | |
432 | |
444 | |
451 | |
454 | |
467 | |
488 | |
66 | |
67 | |
71 | |
78 | |
90 | |
92 | |
98 | |
100 | |
111 | |
117 | |
142 | |
145 | |
146 | |
154 | |
160 | |
162 | |
167 | |
170 | |
174 | |
175 | |
187 | |
193 | |
209 | |
210 | |
214 | |
215 | |
217 | |
225 | |
245 | |
253 | |
255 | |
259 | |
264 | |
276 | |
279 | |
284 | |
286 | |
300 | |
308 | |
309 | |
313 | |
330 | |
337 | |
338 | |
351 | |
354 | |
360 | |
371 | |
375 | |
384 | |
390 | |
491 | |
492 | |
498 | |
500 | |
506 | |
508 | |
524 | |
526 | |
527 | |
531 | |
536 | |
543 | |
550 | |
562 | |
566 | |
604 | |
611 | |
612 | |
618 | |
618 | |
618 | |
629 | |
632 | |
640 | |
648 | |
652 | |
665 | |
671 | |
677 | |
681 | |
684 | |
690 | |
707 | |
709 | |
719 | |
726 | |
740 | |
5 | |
8 | |
3 | |
5 | |
7 | |
1 | |
3 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmative affirmative action Agency amici curiae applied argued the cause Asahi Attorney authority BLACKMUN BRENNAN brief California Certiorari denied Cheng Shin claim coal Coastal Commission concurring Confrontation Clause Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curtilage CZMA decision defendant discrimination dissenting 480 U. S. District Court Due Process Clause employees evidence exclusionary rule federal lands Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment gambling Granite Rock granted Indian interest issue judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE legislative McWebb ment minimum contacts National Farmers Union O'CONNOR officers Opinion Penn Central Transportation Pennsylvania permit requirement personal jurisdiction petitioner police POWELL pre-empted probable cause promotion protected provides question reasonable regulation remanded remedy respondent respondent's rule SCALIA standard Stat statute statutory STEVENS Subsidence Act Supp supra third floor tion Title VII trade or business trial Tribal Court United violation warrant
Popular passages
Page 279 - Individual with a disability means any person who: (i) Has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities; (ii) Has a record of such an impairment; or (iii) Is regarded as having such an impairment.
Page 380 - In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.
Page 355 - We therefore hold that government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.
Page 471 - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law.
Page 618 - It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
Page 176 - ... [t]he burden on a school board today is to come forward with a plan that promises realistically to work, and promises realistically to work now.
Page 5 - ... (b) Determination by court whenever joinder not feasible. If a person as described in subdivision (a) (l)-(2) hereof cannot be made a party, the court shall determine whether in equity and good conscience the action should proceed among the parties before it, or should be dismissed, the absent person being thus regarded as indispensable.
Page 427 - No Contracting State shall expel or return ("refouler") a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.