Nuclear Security: Can DOE Meet Physical Facility Security Requirement : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, Part 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004 - 98 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 15
Page 9
... implementation plans , and developing budgets to support these plans , that may affect the ability of its sites to fully meet the threat contained in the new DBT in a timely fashion . Consequently , DOE's deadline to meet the ...
... implementation plans , and developing budgets to support these plans , that may affect the ability of its sites to fully meet the threat contained in the new DBT in a timely fashion . Consequently , DOE's deadline to meet the ...
Page 12
... implementation plans , and developing budgets to support these plans , that may affect the ability of its sites to fully meet the threat contained in the new DBT in a timely fashion . Consequently , DOE's deadline to meet the ...
... implementation plans , and developing budgets to support these plans , that may affect the ability of its sites to fully meet the threat contained in the new DBT in a timely fashion . Consequently , DOE's deadline to meet the ...
Page 21
... implement this methodology will require additional training to ensure they are employing it properly . DOE's Office ... implementation plans for the May 2003 DBT . Specifically , neither the fiscal year 2003 nor 2004 budgets Page 12 GAO ...
... implement this methodology will require additional training to ensure they are employing it properly . DOE's Office ... implementation plans for the May 2003 DBT . Specifically , neither the fiscal year 2003 nor 2004 budgets Page 12 GAO ...
Page 22
... implementation costs . However , during this period , DOE did receive additional safeguards and security funding ... plans from the original target of October 2003 to the end of January 2004. NNSA and EM approved these plans in February ...
... implementation costs . However , during this period , DOE did receive additional safeguards and security funding ... plans from the original target of October 2003 to the end of January 2004. NNSA and EM approved these plans in February ...
Page 23
... implementation that includes such important program activities as described above is needed ; however , such an approach does not currently exist . The department plans to complete DBT implementation by the end of fiscal year 2006 ...
... implementation that includes such important program activities as described above is needed ; however , such an approach does not currently exist . The department plans to complete DBT implementation by the end of fiscal year 2006 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional adversary Alamos Ambassador Brooks believe BRIAN budget Category I special Chairman Christopher Shays CONGRES CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consolidation cost DBT implementation defend Department of Energy Department's Deputy Secretary Design Basis Threat develop document DOE sites DOE's Office effectiveness efforts Emerging Threats fiscal year 2006 GAO report going guidance HALLORAN highly enriched uranium implementation plans improvised nuclear device Independent Oversight intelligence community issues LIBRARY OF CONGRESS managers McSlarrow million move National Laboratory National Nuclear Security National Security NAZZARO Nevada Test Site NOEL nuclear weapons complex Office of Security Oversight and Performance physical security plutonium PODONSKY POGO Postulated Threat protection programs protection systems protective force radiological response revised Design Basis risk safeguards and security Safety Performance Assurance SECON Security and Safety security program September 11 SHAYS special nuclear material specific Subcommittee on National technologies terrorist attacks testimony Thank threat contained threat identified vulnerability assessment
Popular passages
Page 66 - Defense before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations House Committee on Government Reform on "Iraq Reconstruction, Governance and Security Oversight
Page 1 - The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 1:03 pm, in room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Christopher Shays (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Present: Representatives Shays, Dent, and Kucinich.
Page 7 - Mr. Chairman, that concludes my statement. I would be happy to respond to any questions you or other Subcommittee members may have at this time.
Page 66 - Testimony Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives...
Page 11 - Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence; and the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Page 14 - The key component of DOE's well-established, risk-based security practices is the DBT, a classified document that identifies the characteristics of the potential threats to DOE assets. The DBT has been traditionally based on a classified, multiagency intelligence community assessment of potential terrorist threats, known as the Postulated Threat The DBT considers a variety of threats in addition to the terrorist threat Other adversaries considered in the DBT include criminals, psychotics, disgruntled...
Page 16 - Like the participants responsible for developing the Postulated Threat, during the development of the DBT, DOE officials debated the size of the future terrorist threat and the costs to meet it. DOE officials at all levels told us that concern over resources played a large role in developing the 2003 DBT, with some officials calling the DBT the "funding basis threat," or the maximum threat the department could afford.
Page 13 - DOE's Office of Security develops and promulgates orders and policies, such as the DBT, to guide the department's safeguards and security programs. DOE's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance supports the department by, among other things, independently evaluating the effectiveness of contractors' performance in safeguards and security.
Page 16 - ... that DOE establish a policy on what actions are required once high or moderate risk is identified, in September 2003, DOE's Office of Security issued a policy clarification stating that identified high risks at facilities must be formally reported to the Secretary of Energy or Deputy Secretary within 24 hours. In addition, under this policy clarification, identified high and moderate risks require corrective actions and regular reporting. Through a variety of complementary measures, DOE ensures...