Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Volume 37Edward O. Jenkins, 1869 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 55
Page v
... Ex'r , ats . REID .. 63 BROWN et al . ats . MARKHAM .. 277 BRYAN vs. THE SOUTH - WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY . 26 BRYANT ats . BAKER ........ 12 BUCHANON et al . ats . PATERSON , Tenant ....... 560 COLCLOUGH ats . CUNNINGHAM ... 124 CAMP ...
... Ex'r , ats . REID .. 63 BROWN et al . ats . MARKHAM .. 277 BRYAN vs. THE SOUTH - WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY . 26 BRYANT ats . BAKER ........ 12 BUCHANON et al . ats . PATERSON , Tenant ....... 560 COLCLOUGH ats . CUNNINGHAM ... 124 CAMP ...
Page vi
... Ex'r , et al .............................. .. 11 DOE , ex DEARMOND , vs BROOKING ...... DOE , ex KALB ats . GRUBB ... Ex'r , et al . vs. PRICE ...... 23 EAST TENNESSEE & GEORGIA RAILROAD ats . GREEN .. 45 ) EUFAULA HOME INSURANCE ...
... Ex'r , et al .............................. .. 11 DOE , ex DEARMOND , vs BROOKING ...... DOE , ex KALB ats . GRUBB ... Ex'r , et al . vs. PRICE ...... 23 EAST TENNESSEE & GEORGIA RAILROAD ats . GREEN .. 45 ) EUFAULA HOME INSURANCE ...
Page vii
... Ex'r , et al . vs. SHEWMAKE et al ... ............... .. 102 KALB et al . ats . GRUBB et al ............. 459 ... Ex'r , vs. FERGUSON .. 558 MITCHEL vs. HAY . 581 MITCHEL et al . vs. HENDRICKS , Ex'r ...
... Ex'r , et al . vs. SHEWMAKE et al ... ............... .. 102 KALB et al . ats . GRUBB et al ............. 459 ... Ex'r , vs. FERGUSON .. 558 MITCHEL vs. HAY . 581 MITCHEL et al . vs. HENDRICKS , Ex'r ...
Page viii
... Ex'r ................................. . 235 PUMP & CO . ats . STIX & CO ........ 332 PURCEL ats . SOUTHERN EXPRESS ... Ex'r ... 63 REID & CO . ats . MAYER ........... 482 REYNOLDS et al . vs. BRISTOW & KENT ... ....... 283 RICHARDSON et ...
... Ex'r ................................. . 235 PUMP & CO . ats . STIX & CO ........ 332 PURCEL ats . SOUTHERN EXPRESS ... Ex'r ... 63 REID & CO . ats . MAYER ........... 482 REYNOLDS et al . vs. BRISTOW & KENT ... ....... 283 RICHARDSON et ...
Page ix
... Ex'r ............ SULLIVAN'S ADMINISTRATOR vs. GILBERT . SUMMERFORD , Adm'r , vs. GILBERT ..................... .. TAYLOR vs. GREEN .... TAYLOR , Ex'r . vs. HARP & JONES ............. THE AUGUSTA INSURANCE AND BANKING COMPANY ats ...
... Ex'r ............ SULLIVAN'S ADMINISTRATOR vs. GILBERT . SUMMERFORD , Adm'r , vs. GILBERT ..................... .. TAYLOR vs. GREEN .... TAYLOR , Ex'r . vs. HARP & JONES ............. THE AUGUSTA INSURANCE AND BANKING COMPANY ats ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adm'r administrator affidavit aforesaid appointed assets attachment attorney attorney at law Augusta Aycock Beall bill bond charged the jury claim Cleckley common law Company complainant Confederate constitution contract corporation cotton Court of Equity creditor currency debts deceased Decided by Judge declared deed defendant in error defendant's demurrer Dickerson discharge dollars dower equity evidence ex'r execution executor facts filed Fulton county Georgia Georgia Railroad granted ground held injunction interest John Jones judgment Justice land legal obligation legislature levied liability lien ment Mordecai mortgage motion negroes paid parties payment plaintiff in error possession principles promissory note Railroad and Banking received refused remedy rent Revised Code Robenson rule sheriff sold Southern Express Company statute sued suit Superior Court surety surrender term testator testified thereof Thrasher tion Toomer trial Upson County usurious Vason verdict Walker William witness
Popular passages
Page 530 - Philadelphia, for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation, and reporting to Congress and the several Legislatures such alterations and provisions therein as shall, when agreed to in Congress and confirmed by the States, render the Federal Constitution adequate to the exigencies of Government and the preservation of the Union.
Page 535 - We choose rather to plant ourselves on what we consider impregnable positions. They are these : That a State has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction over all persons and things, within its territorial limits, as any foreign nation; where that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the Constitution of the united States.
Page 532 - The instrument was not intended to provide merely for the exigencies of a few years, but was to endure through a long lapse of ages, the events of which were locked up in the inscrutable purposes of Providence.
Page 546 - Having no common superior to judge between them, they stand in precisely the same predicament as two nations who engage in a contest and have recourse to arms.
Page 182 - It may, if it thinks proper, direct that the necessary implements of agriculture, or the tools of the mechanic, or articles of necessity in household furniture, shall, like wearing apparel, not be liable to execution on judgments.
Page 136 - I take it to be a clear position that if a legislative act oppugns a constitutional principle the former must give way, and be rejected on the score of repugnance. I hold it to be a position equally clear and sound that in such case, it will be the duty of the court to adhere to the Constitution and to declare the act null and void.
Page 129 - The objection to a law, on the ground of its impairing the obligation of a contract, can never depend upon the extent of the change which the law effects in it. Any deviation from its terms, by postponing or accelerating the period of performance which it prescribes, imposing conditions not expressed in the contract, or dispensing with the performance of those which are, however minute or apparently immaterial in their effect upon the contract of the parties, impairs [ * 85 ] its obligation.
Page 136 - Whatever may be the case in other countries, yet in this, there can be no doubt, that every act of the Legislature, repugnant to the Constitution, is absolutely void.
Page 538 - Constitution, and the laws of the United States made in pursuance thereof, shall be the supreme law of the land, any thing in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
Page 532 - The contract between Georgia and the purchasers was executed by the grant. A contract executed, as well as one which is executory, contains obligations binding on the parties. A grant, in its own nature, amounts to an extinguishment of the right of the grantor, and implies a contract not to reassert that right. A party is, therefore, always estopped by his own grant.