Athenian DemocracyAthens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty means above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as a mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German, and French scholarship on its origins, theory, and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the maneuverings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes, and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyze a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 35
Page 46
Counting the votes is a slow procedure , but in a close vote it inspires more confidence than a rough estimate , and the line between a fair and a crooked assessment of the majority can be sharply drawn , at least by the tellers ...
Counting the votes is a slow procedure , but in a close vote it inspires more confidence than a rough estimate , and the line between a fair and a crooked assessment of the majority can be sharply drawn , at least by the tellers ...
Page 56
The majority was assessed on a rough estimate . That is what our only explicit source says : the nine proedroi ( who preside over the ecclesia ) judge the votes taken by a show of hands ( Arist . Ath . Pol .
The majority was assessed on a rough estimate . That is what our only explicit source says : the nine proedroi ( who preside over the ecclesia ) judge the votes taken by a show of hands ( Arist . Ath . Pol .
Page 59
So Aristotle probably refers to a procedure by which a small number of voters is selected by lot and entrusted with the decision of an issue when even a repeated show of hands does not allow to decide where the majority is .
So Aristotle probably refers to a procedure by which a small number of voters is selected by lot and entrusted with the decision of an issue when even a repeated show of hands does not allow to decide where the majority is .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction to Part I | 15 |
How Did the Athenian Ecclesia Vote? | 40 |
Aristotle the Kleroteria and the Courts | 62 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Acropolis Aeschin allotment rooms ancient apagōgē apotumpanismos archon Areopagus argues Arist Aristophanes Aristotle Aristotle's assembly Athenian democracy Athenian Ecclesia Athenian politics Attica boule Brauron century B.C. cheirotonia choinikes citizens citizenship Classical Athens Cleisthenes Cleomenes competition Constitution of Athens Council courts decree deme democratic demos Demosthenes dikasterion dikasts drachmas eisangelia Ephialtes evidence festival fifth century fourth century Greece Greek Hansen Heliaia Herodotus Hesperia hoplite Hypereides IG iiČ important Isagoras jurors jury kanonides Keramopoullos kleroteria leaders Lysias medimnos obols offences officials oligarchic orators Oxford P. J. Rhodes Panathenaia Peisistratid Pericles phratry Plato Plut Plutarch polis Politeia politicians poor procedure proedroi Prytaneis psephoi punishment reforms Revolution says seems show of hands slaves slots Solon Solonian Spartans speech Thuc Thucydides ticket-inserters tickets tribe trittyes trittys tyrants University Press vote wheat word δὲ καὶ τὰ τὴν τῶν