Page images
PDF
EPUB

REPORT.

OF

THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS.

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS,

Washington, D. C., October 20, 1871.

SIR: I have the honor to present, for your information, the following report upon the duties of the Engineer Department during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1871:

OFFICERS OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.

The number of officers in the Corps of Engineers at the end of the fiscal year was 100 on the active list, and six on the retired list. In addition, the corps was aided in the performance of the duties intrusted to it, by a number of civil engineers, geologists, &c.

Since the last report, the corps has lost by death Major Chauncey B. Reese, brevet brigadier general United States Army; First Lieutenant William H. Chase and Brevet Second Lieutenant James B. Mackall, and one captain and two second lieutenants, by resignation; the captain, Brevet Lieutenant Colonel Peter S. Michie, having been appointed professor of natural and experimental philosophy at the Military Academy.

On the 30th of June, 1871, the officers were distributed as follows: On duty in the office of the Chief of Engineers, including the Chief. On duty with boards of engineers for fortifications. On duty with battalion of engineers....

4

6

12

On duty, construction of fortifications..

8

On duty, survey and construction of river and harbor. improve

ments..

23

On duty, construction of fortifications, and river and harbor improvements......

21

On duty, survey of northern and northwestern lakes.

6

On duty, explorations in the field west of Rocky Mountains.
In charge of public buildings, grounds, &c.

2

1

On special duty.

Absent sick....

1

1

Detached, on duty with generals commanding divisions, departments, &c., Light-House Establishment, Military Academy, &c..

100

Total........

The officers detached were on duty as follows:

Lieutenant Colonel I. C. Woodruff, engineer third and fourth lighthonse districts.

1

Major Nathaniel Michler, on staff of major general commanding
Military Division of the Pacific...

Major George H. Elliot, engineer secretary to Light-House Board..
Captain John W. Barlow, on staff of Lieutenant General, command-
ing Military Division of the Missouri.....

Captain Peter C. Hains, engineer fifth and sixth light-house districts. Captain David P. Heap, on staff of commanding general Department of Dakota..

Captain William A. Jones, on staff of commanding general Depart-
ment of the Platte...

First Lieutenant Ernest II. Ruffner, on staff of commanding gen-
eral Department of the Missouri..
Captain Garret J. Lydecker, First Lieutenant James C. Post, First
Lieutenant James Mercur, First Lieutenant John C. Mallery,
Second Lieutenant Albert H. Payson, Brevet Second Lieutenant
Edgar W. Bass, and Brevet Second Lieutenant William L. Marshall,
on duty at the Military Academy....

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

15

The following principal civil engineers and geologists were employed on the 30th of June: General J. H. Wilson, member of board of engineers upon improvement of the Des Moines and Rock Island rapids, and improvement of the Illinois River; Clarence King, geologist in charge of geological exploration of the fortieth parallel; and Professor Wesley Newcomb, mining engineer Sutro Tunnel Commission.

By legislation contained in section 6 of the act approved March 3, 1869, it is provided that there shall be no new appointments and no promotions in the Corps of Engineers until otherwise directed by law. Under the operations of this law, the strength of the Corps of Engineers has since that date become so much reduced, that the want of officers, for the performance of the varied and extensive duties imposed by law upon the Engineer Department, is becoming a serious embarrassment. It is earnestly recommended that Congress be asked to so modify the provisions of this law as to remove the prohibition of promotions and appointments in the

corps.

SEA-COAST AND LAKE FRONTIER DEFENSES.

From the experience gained during the recent war in the attack and defense of sea-coast defenses, and from experiments made since the war, at home and abroad, upon materials in use in such defensive works, the conclusions have been arrived at which form the governing principles in determining the nature and extent of the sea-coast works we are now building. These conclusions, and the steps leading to them, have been set forth in my annual reports during the past few years, but the former may be briefly recapitulated as follows:

First. To confine the new constructions to powerful barbette batteries in earth and sand, thoroughly protected by traverses and parados, and to modify existing barbette batteries so as to bring them to the neces sary standard of strength and efficiency;

Second. To substitute as far as practicable depressing gun carriages for those that expose the armament and cannoniers above the parapet; Third. To make liberal use of heavy mortars;

Fourth. To employ torpedoes as accessories in the defense of the channel ways and approaches to the harbors;

Fifth. To use obstructions and floating batteries to retain the enemy before the guns of the littoral batteries; and

Sixth. To use in the batteries the most powerful guns of modern ordnance.

These principles for the construction of our coast defenses have received both executive and legislative approval, and moderate appropriations for constructions in accordance with them have been made by Congress for the defensive works of some of our principal sea ports and centers of commerce. With these appropriations good progress has been made, during the past year, in the modification of existing works and the commencement of new emplacements for heavy guns and mortars. For the works along the southern seaboard, the season of active operations, since the granting of appropriations for that section, has not yet arrived, but the modifications will be carried out as far as the moderate means available will allow during the coming working season. Upon other fortifications not included in the above, the work has been confined principally to the protection of the sites, the preservation of those portions of the works in an unfinished condition, and to the modification of platforms for the introduction of heavier armaments.

In the preceding no reference has been made to casemated works, and there is at present no intention on the part of the Engineer Department to recommend either the modification of existing casemates or the construction of new works of this kind. But it is important that some guns at each of our great harbors should be protected by casemate cover of some kind. What that kind should be has not yet been satisfactorily determined. To learn what maritime countries were doing in this particular, and especially the extent to which iron had been introduced into their sea-coast defenses, Colonels Barnard and Wright and Captain Michie were, by your orders, sent abroad last year. The report of this Board of Engineers, now in press, contains the results of their observations and inquiries, so far as the information gained was not of a confidential character. This information will be found valuable in devising structures for the casemate cover of guns at those sites where such cover is essential to the perfection of the system of shore defenses. Experiments have been made with King's counterpoise carriage, and are still in progress, while several designs of carriages for effecting the same purpose are under examination in the Engineer Department. There seems to be good reason to believe that a serviceable carriage for the purpose needed will soon be obtained, and in anticipation of this event the points at which such carriages should be placed in our projected works have been designated in advance.

Torpedo experiments, of the character mentioned in my report of the past year, have been carried on at Willet's Point, and considerable advance has been made in the investigation of the methods of firing torpedoes and the development of the law governing explosions of various powders under water.

The use of obstructions in the fairways and channels leading to our sea-ports will be indispensable in a conflict with a maritime power of any prominence, but neither these nor torpedoes can be successfully moored or managed without an intimate knowledge of the direction and velocities of the tidal currents peculiar to the localities. These considerations have led, during the past year, to a series of examinations in our principal harbors upon the velocity and direction of the currents, and data has thus been obtained not only useful for defensive purposes but also for commercial purposes in the improvement of the channel ways and harbors.

The progress made in each of the several works upon the coast is more particularly set forth in the following pages. The estimates of amounts required for the year have been made upon carefully considered projects, and are for the completion or continuance of the works in accordance with the approved principles already enunciated.

FORTIFICATIONS.

Fort Wayne, Detroit, Michigan, in charge of Major Walter McFarland until April 25, 1871; since then of Captain G. L. Gillespie, Corps of En gineers. This work commands the channel of Detroit River, and, with its exterior barbette batteries, will control the navigation of that stream. These batteries are not completed, but should be finished and additional batteries projected. Plans for the modification of this work have been prepared during the past season, but are held for further consideration before being recommended for approval.

No appropriation was made for fiscal year ending June 30, 1872.
No appropriation asked for the next fiscal year.

No construction or repairs have been made during the past year. The expense incurred has been for the care and preservation of the work. Fort Porter, Black Rock, near Buffalo, New York, in charge of Captain F. Harwood, Corps of Engineers.-This work occupies an important strategic point for the defense of the northern frontier. It remains in the condition reported in 1869-70, and no work has been done upon it during the past year. Projects for its repair have been prepared, but are withheld for further consideration.

No appropriation was made for fiscal year ending June 30, 1872.
No appropriation asked for the next fiscal year.

Fort Niagara, mouth of Niagara River, New York, in charge of Major N. Bowen from July 1 to November 23, 1870, and from January 13 to 25, 1871; First Lieutenant B. D. Greene from November 23, 1870, to January 13, 1871; and Major John M. Wilson, Corps of Engineers, since January 25, 1871.-This work is situated at the mouth of Niagara River, commanding its debouch into Lake Ontario. During the past year the force upon the work has been engaged as follows: Raising, grading, and sodding the terre plein and parapet of the north and south bastions and the curtain; building a wooden platform for a 44-inch rifled gun, in rear of the flank casemate of the south bastion; removing im perfect brick and replacing them with new, and pointing the scarp wall; repairing and relaying the stone gutter, and making a new one down the slope at the south end of the main ditch.

No appropriation was made for fiscal year ending June 30, 1872; funds used were derived from appropriation for contingencies of fortifications.

Appropriation asked for the next fiscal year, $25,000.

During the present fiscal year it is proposed to repair the crib-work protection at the northwest angle of the fort, rebuild the six jettees along the lake shore, pave the postern, and make and hang the gates. build a slope-wall protection to the sea wall at the salient angle of the north bastion, pave the casemates, complete the drainage of the main ditch, and point and repair the scarp wall.

Fort Ontario, Oswego, New York, in charge of Major N. Bowen from July 1 to November 23, 1870, and from January 13 to 25, 1871; First Lieutenant B. D. Greene from November 23, 1870 to January 13, 1871; and Major John M. Wilson, Corps of Engineers, since January 25, 1871This work protects the city of Oswego from a sudden attack or coup de

main, or the levy of a contribution by a small force of the enemy on shipboard. The work in progress upon the fort is the replacing of the old timber scarp, which has rotted away, by more durable materials, and the modification of the barbette for the heavy modern ordnance.

No appropriation was made for fiscal year ending June 30, 1872; funds used were derived from appropriation for contingencies of fortifications.

Appropriation asked for the next fiscal year, $30,000.

During the past year the force upon this work has been employed as follows: Continuing gallery in right flank of bastion E, completing it, except coping and lintel to entrance; completing scarp wall of right face of bastion E, and curtain A-E, and backing it with concrete; continuing gallery in left flank of bastion A; completing scarp wall of curtain A-B, except coping, and nearly completing scarp wall of the left face of bastion B; building dry walls in the galleries and under the back of stairways in bastions E and A; sodding parapets of right and left faces, and grading terre plein of bastion D; putting new roofs on guard-houses, and introducing city water and placing fire-hydrant in the vicinity of the engineer store-houses.

During the present year it is proposed to complete the gallery in bastion E, and the one in the left flank of bastion A; to put on the coping and parapet around to the salient of the latter bastion; to build the connection of the gallery in bastion D, with the proposed magazine, and complete the parapet as far as the right re-entering angle of bastion C.

Fort Montgomery, outlet of Lake Champlain, New York, in charge of Lieutenant Colonel John Newton, Corps of Engineers.-This work occupies an important strategic point, and commands the entrance to Lake Champlain from Richelieu or St. John River. The work is essentially completed for the old styles of armament, and requires modifications to suit it to the modern guns. Projects for this purpose have been prepared by the Board of Engineers for fortifications, and approved, and the necessary modifications directed to be made.

No appropriation was made for fiscal year ending June 30, 1872. Appropriation asked for next fiscal year, needed to complete this work, $22,000.

Fort Knox, Bucksport, Penobscot River, Maine, in charge of Lieutenant Colonel J. C. Duane, Corps of Engineers.-This work, situated at the narrows of the Penobscot River, furnishes a defense for the city of Bangor and other towns bordering the Penobscot, and renders the river available as a secure harbor of refuge for the shipping of the extensive eastern sea coast. The work is essentially completed, with the exception of some modifications in its barbette batteries to fit them for the large guns now used.

No appropriation was made for fiscal year ending June 30, 1872.
No appropriation asked for the next fiscal year.

The condition of this work remains the same as at the close of the last fiscal year, the only work performed being such as was necessary for the repairs of temporary roofs and general care of the work.

Fort Popham, mouth of Kennebec River, Maine, in charge of Lieutenant Colonel J. C. Duane, Corps of Engineers.-This work defends the entrance, through the mouth of Kennebec River, to the rich valley of this river, the cities of Bath and Augusta, and the United States arsenal at the latter place. It has been finished upon its gun-fronts to the level of the barbette batteries. The projects for it completion have not yet been prepared.

« PreviousContinue »