The U.S. Press and Iran: Foreign Policy and the Journalism of DeferenceNo one seriously interested in the character of public knowledge and the quality of debate over American alliances can afford to ignore the complex link between press and policy and the ways in which mainstream journalism in the U.S. portrays a Third World ally. The case of Iran offers a particularly rich view of these dynamics and suggests that the press is far from fulfilling the watchdog role assigned it in democratic theory and popular imagination. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
11 | |
31 | |
The Consolidation of Power 19541962 | 63 |
Modernization Myth and Media 19631973 | 82 |
Further Illusions 19631973 | 116 |
The New Persian Empire 19731977 | 131 |
The Press and the 1978 Revolution West Meets East | 152 |
Journalism as Capitalism | 183 |
The Journalism of Deference | 201 |
Conclusion | 229 |
Notes | 237 |
Index | 265 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
According affairs American American press analysis appear argued arms attention August become began believe chapter Christian Science Monitor concern continued correspondents coup course cover coverage critical demonstrated discussion dominant early economic editorial effect elections elites established evidence example fact final forces foreign policy given Ibid ideology important instance interest International involvement Iran Iran's Iranian issue January journalism journalists land reform largely later least liberal Love mainstream major March mass matter Middle East Mosaddeq newspaper objectivity official opinion opposition organizations particularly period Persian political popular possibility published question readers reality reasons received regime religious reporters result revolution role rule shah shah's significant simply situation social society story suggested Third throughout tion turn United University usually Washington Washington Post White women wrote York