 | Robert E. Baldwin - 2008 - 392 pages
...-0.3828 -0.0251 -1.5085 82 0.0091 - 0.5634 -0.0133 -1.132 83 0.0123 -0.721 -0.0121 - 1 .0685 Table 4.6 (continued) 'Significant at the 10 percent level. ''Significant at the 5 percent level from positive to negative in the case of hrw wheat, while it is consistently negative for dns wheat.... | |
 | John M. Holt - 1990 - 219 pages
...magnitude of the residual SD will reflect this. 2 Includes results for only specimens with a > 140 mils. * Significant at the 10 percent level **Significant at the 5 percent level 4 Rsb 43 0.077 41 0.076 40 0.073 39 5 R5b 28 0.118 26 0.119 25 0.105 24 6 *5b 51 0.072 49 0.060** 48... | |
 | Paul E. Peterson, Mark C. Rom - 2010 - 196 pages
...MAGNETS TABLE 3-1. Explaining Changes in Poverty8 Recursive model Simultaneous model (two-stage) * Significant at the 10 percent level. * Significant at the 5 percent level. $ Significant at the 1 percent level. a. Numbers in parentheses are ^-statistics. b. To make direct... | |
 | Arthur A. Fleisher, Brian L. Goff, Robert D. Tollison - 1992 - 208 pages
...percentage. The numbers in parentheses are f-statistics. 140 TABLE 23 LOGIT Estimate of Membership *significant at the 10 percent level, ''significant at the 5 percent level, ^significant at the 1 percent level. carry the expected signs and are significant at the 1 percent... | |
 | George J. Borjas, Richard B. Freeman - 2007 - 294 pages
...weighted by the size of that SMSA. Table 8.1 Relation between Immigration and Native Migration Rates Significant at the 10 percent level. ** Significant at the 5 percent level. ***Significant at the 1 percent level. All 272 SMSAs 100 Largest SMSAs 100 Highest Immigration Rates... | |
 | Takatoshi Ito, Anne O. Krueger - 2007 - 462 pages
....0226 - .0953 (.60) (.40) (3.05) (1.18) (1.59) ¿V = 280, weighted/?2 = .0846 Note: See table 12.2. *Significant at the 10 percent level. ** Significant at the 5 percent level. Table 12.3 Interest Group Model of Non-tariff Barriers, 1986 NTB1 NTB3 NTB4 NTB5 NTB6 Constant .0317... | |
 | United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee - 1993 - 414 pages
...Medicare 1984 - 0.017 (0.023) Medicare 1985 - 0.013 (0.023) a* 022 031 034 033 0.31 N 404 404 404 404 1616 •Significant at the 10 percent level ••Significant at the 5 percent level. •••Sienificant at the 1 nercenl level. , two-tailed /-test, two-tailed Men. two-taikd Men. Journal... | |
 | Dayanatha Jha, Behjat Hojjati - 1993 - 94 pages
...Coefficient t-Statistic Note: Variables are defined in Table 19. *Significant at the 20 percent level. **Significant at the 10 percent level. ***Significant at the 5 percent level. Fertilizer Use Local Local and Hybrid Maize Hybrid Maize None Only Maize Only Variable (0) (1) (2)... | |
 | Lisa M. Lynch - 2007 - 332 pages
...Table 9.5 Percentage Increase in Hourly Earnings by Type of Training (control group: "no training") *Significant at the 10 percent level. "Significant at the 5 percent level. Men Women Post- 16 Full-Time Education 5.5** 2.2 YTS Only 4.7 -4.5* Current Off-the-Job Training No... | |
 | N. Gregory Mankiw - 2007 - 358 pages
...Thus 85.6 percent is the percentage of these firms that report holding inventories of finished goods. *Significant at the 10 percent level. "Significant at the 5 percent level. importance; and the aggregation process is complex. To illustrate, imagine that ten firms selling intermediate... | |
| |
Significant at the 10 percent level. * * Significant at the 5 percent level. * * * Significant at the 1 percent level. 
