Athenian DemocracyP. J. Rhodes Edinburgh University Press, 2019 M08 7 - 304 pages Athens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 62
Page 7
... taken to extremes it could suggest that politicians were concerned only with manoeuvring to strengthen their power base and were never committed to the rightness of particular policies. In the second half of the twentieth century the ...
... taken to extremes it could suggest that politicians were concerned only with manoeuvring to strengthen their power base and were never committed to the rightness of particular policies. In the second half of the twentieth century the ...
Page 20
... taken to ensure that out-groups remained out-groups. Proxenoi ['representatives', normally of Athens in their own state, but the title tended to be awarded honorifically to foreigners in Athens], for instance: key men though they were ...
... taken to ensure that out-groups remained out-groups. Proxenoi ['representatives', normally of Athens in their own state, but the title tended to be awarded honorifically to foreigners in Athens], for instance: key men though they were ...
Page 24
... taken away, and the phratry members voted on the matter, carrying their votes from the altar. Procedures, then, are elaborate, and become even more so in the only phratry that we know much about.28 While there must have been an ...
... taken away, and the phratry members voted on the matter, carrying their votes from the altar. Procedures, then, are elaborate, and become even more so in the only phratry that we know much about.28 While there must have been an ...
Page 25
... taken into account. First, the breakdown of these rigid descent rules does not correlate with the decline in the relative value (in the Aegean, in Greece generally, or in Athens herself) of the citizenship. Isoteleia survived as a ...
... taken into account. First, the breakdown of these rigid descent rules does not correlate with the decline in the relative value (in the Aegean, in Greece generally, or in Athens herself) of the citizenship. Isoteleia survived as a ...
Page 30
... taken in public life but also in the consciousness of individuals. To go further, we need to be more formal, and to distinguish between [A] the inhabitants of a particular area or community, and [B] those who are citizens of that ...
... taken in public life but also in the consciousness of individuals. To go further, we need to be more formal, and to distinguish between [A] the inhabitants of a particular area or community, and [B] those who are citizens of that ...
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole