Athenian DemocracyAthens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 35
Page 3
The year a.d. 1993/4, 2,500 years after Cleisthenes' reforms, was celebrated as the 2,500th anniversary of democracy; but in fact Ephialtes' reforms, though representing the culmination of a long development, which had been proceeding ...
The year a.d. 1993/4, 2,500 years after Cleisthenes' reforms, was celebrated as the 2,500th anniversary of democracy; but in fact Ephialtes' reforms, though representing the culmination of a long development, which had been proceeding ...
Page 9
Whenever we believe that Athens first became democratic, the reforms of Solon (Chapter 10), Cleisthenes (Chapters 11, 12) and Ephialtes (Chapter 13) are commonly seen as milestones in Athens' political development, and studies of these ...
Whenever we believe that Athens first became democratic, the reforms of Solon (Chapter 10), Cleisthenes (Chapters 11, 12) and Ephialtes (Chapter 13) are commonly seen as milestones in Athens' political development, and studies of these ...
Page 11
Doubts about Solon's reforms as presented in texts of the fourth century and later are not new, but in the late twentieth century they became fashionable: in Chapter 10 C. Mossé starts from the fourth-century view of Solon and treats it ...
Doubts about Solon's reforms as presented in texts of the fourth century and later are not new, but in the late twentieth century they became fashionable: in Chapter 10 C. Mossé starts from the fourth-century view of Solon and treats it ...
Page 32
The author also claims that Kleisthenes broached his tribal reforms, 'offering the citizenship (?) to the people' (αποδιδου` τˆ πλη ́θει τη`ν πολιτεαν, 20.1: the translation is disputed), that they were adopted 'in order that more might ...
The author also claims that Kleisthenes broached his tribal reforms, 'offering the citizenship (?) to the people' (αποδιδου` τˆ πλη ́θει τη`ν πολιτεαν, 20.1: the translation is disputed), that they were adopted 'in order that more might ...
Page 33
The point is, rather, that it is agreed that Ath. Pol. or his source had additional material about the Kleisthenic period – dates, detail about the tribal reforms, the Leipsydrion skolion – which he incorporated into a basically ...
The point is, rather, that it is agreed that Ath. Pol. or his source had additional material about the Kleisthenic period – dates, detail about the tribal reforms, the Leipsydrion skolion – which he incorporated into a basically ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole