Athenian DemocracyAthens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 34
Page 7
... to extremes it should lead to the conclusion that any one person's construction has as much validity as any other's.18 Thus in a review article on M. H. Hansen's The Athenian Assembly in the Age of Demosthenes J. Ober complains that ...
... to extremes it should lead to the conclusion that any one person's construction has as much validity as any other's.18 Thus in a review article on M. H. Hansen's The Athenian Assembly in the Age of Demosthenes J. Ober complains that ...
Page 22
The anchisteia comprises those members of EGO's [a person's] bilateral kindred who are related to him as far as the degree of 'children of cousins' (μχρι ανεψιωˆν παδων). There are difficulties in determining precisely whom this ...
The anchisteia comprises those members of EGO's [a person's] bilateral kindred who are related to him as far as the degree of 'children of cousins' (μχρι ανεψιωˆν παδων). There are difficulties in determining precisely whom this ...
Page 26
If, as most do, we accept the historicity of a process44 by which, in 445/4 in the wake of a general distribution of corn, 4760 persons were disfranchised as 'illegitimately enrolled' parengraphoi,45 we have some idea of the possible ...
If, as most do, we accept the historicity of a process44 by which, in 445/4 in the wake of a general distribution of corn, 4760 persons were disfranchised as 'illegitimately enrolled' parengraphoi,45 we have some idea of the possible ...
Page 28
Nonetheless, she did better the second time, being given in marriage by Stephanos, again as his legitimate daughter, to no less a person than the Archon Basileus, one Theogenes, to whom Stephanos was currently serving as assessor.
Nonetheless, she did better the second time, being given in marriage by Stephanos, again as his legitimate daughter, to no less a person than the Archon Basileus, one Theogenes, to whom Stephanos was currently serving as assessor.
Page 29
For example, the cardinal fact of Heros and Epitrepontes is that young man rapes girl, and they subsequently marry without knowing that the other was the person involved, while the children born of the rape are exposed.
For example, the cardinal fact of Heros and Epitrepontes is that young man rapes girl, and they subsequently marry without knowing that the other was the person involved, while the children born of the rape are exposed.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole