Athenian DemocracyAthens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 27
Page viii
The articles included in this book were originally published in a range of different journals and books, and in various matters of presentation the authors and publishers had their own preferences. In this book a degree of uniformity ...
The articles included in this book were originally published in a range of different journals and books, and in various matters of presentation the authors and publishers had their own preferences. In this book a degree of uniformity ...
Page 7
... have claimed that what originally happened in the past is irretrievable, that the texts which we use as sources were constructing history to suit their purposes, and when we work with the sources we are constructing history to suit ...
... have claimed that what originally happened in the past is irretrievable, that the texts which we use as sources were constructing history to suit their purposes, and when we work with the sources we are constructing history to suit ...
Page 11
The archaic period (c.800–500) is particularly vulnerable to the claim of the postmodernists that what originally happened is irretrievable (cf. above), since most of our written evidence for it is not contemporary but later, ...
The archaic period (c.800–500) is particularly vulnerable to the claim of the postmodernists that what originally happened is irretrievable (cf. above), since most of our written evidence for it is not contemporary but later, ...
Page 16
3 See S. C. Humphreys, 'The Work of Louis Gernet', History and Theory x 1971, 172–96 = her Anthropology and the Greeks, 76–94. * Originally published in Classical Journal 1xxiii 1977/8, 105–21; reprinted 16 Political Institutions.
3 See S. C. Humphreys, 'The Work of Louis Gernet', History and Theory x 1971, 172–96 = her Anthropology and the Greeks, 76–94. * Originally published in Classical Journal 1xxiii 1977/8, 105–21; reprinted 16 Political Institutions.
Page 18
Originally published in Classical Journal 1xxiii 1977/8, 105–21; reprinted with the permission of the author and of the Classical Association of the Middle West and South. † After its first presentation at Princeton on 2 April 1977, ...
Originally published in Classical Journal 1xxiii 1977/8, 105–21; reprinted with the permission of the author and of the Classical Association of the Middle West and South. † After its first presentation at Princeton on 2 April 1977, ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole