Athenian DemocracyAthens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 42
Page 3
Making decisions was entrusted to the citizens directly, in an ekklesia, assembly, open to all citizens (some kinds of business required a quorum of 6,000, perhaps 10 per cent of the citizens before the Peloponnesian War of 431–404 and ...
Making decisions was entrusted to the citizens directly, in an ekklesia, assembly, open to all citizens (some kinds of business required a quorum of 6,000, perhaps 10 per cent of the citizens before the Peloponnesian War of 431–404 and ...
Page 4
... individually but might own more together, and might be less good at deciding individually but better together,5 was prepared where there was no supremely good individual to settle for a compromise between oligarchy and democracy.
... individually but might own more together, and might be less good at deciding individually but better together,5 was prepared where there was no supremely good individual to settle for a compromise between oligarchy and democracy.
Page 19
... for the moment is not so much the rules themselves, which are clear, as the degree of buttressing and re-inforcement which they receive throughout the classical period from institutions and from administrative or legal decisions.
... for the moment is not so much the rules themselves, which are clear, as the degree of buttressing and re-inforcement which they receive throughout the classical period from institutions and from administrative or legal decisions.
Page 30
So much for the effect of the citizenship rules in their classical formulation, pervasive not just in decisions taken in public life but also in the consciousness of individuals. To go further, we need to be more formal, ...
So much for the effect of the citizenship rules in their classical formulation, pervasive not just in decisions taken in public life but also in the consciousness of individuals. To go further, we need to be more formal, ...
Page 39
Its erosion came only when, with the disappearance of pay for public service at a date not closely determinable in the third century b.c. and the decline in importance of decisions taken in the assembly, the lower boundary of citizen ...
Its erosion came only when, with the disappearance of pay for public service at a date not closely determinable in the third century b.c. and the decline in importance of decisions taken in the assembly, the lower boundary of citizen ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole