Page images
PDF
EPUB

5

copyright system

[ocr errors]

to ensure the availability of the

widest possible diversity of talent and art forms to Americans of varied tastes.

Significantly, the economic impact of home taping is also borne by the consumer. Home taping reduces the sales volume of records and pre-recorded tapes. The costs of production thus must be spread over fewer albums. This can force up the price of the records that are sold. As a result, those who buy records pay more so that those who tape off-the-air or from borrowed records can pay nothing.

The Solution to the Home Taping Problem

Congress is now considering legislation to

resolve the home taping problem

-

Amendment No. 1333

to S. 1758, introduced by Senator Mathias2/ and H. R. 5705, introduced by Representative Don Edwards.3/

2/ This amendment is also co-sponsored by Senators
Baker, R. Byrd, Cranston, Stevens, Baucus, Hart,
Boschwitz, Dodd, Cochran, Riegle, Kasten, Sasser,
Burdick, Pressler and Boren.

RIAA

3/ This bill is also co-sponsored by Representatives
Schroeder, Quillen, Moorhead, Boner, Wright, Pashayan,
Mineta, Waxman, Zeferetti, Dixon, Clay, Dymally,
Chisholm, Fauntroy, Hefner, T. Evans, Carney, Fazio,
Cheney, W. Ford, Moffett, Roybal, Reuss, Hawkins, Peyser,
Patterson, Richmond, Downey, Bonior, Conyers, P.

Mitchell, Edgar, Wilson, Dowdy, AuCoin, Ferraro, Leath,
Hunter, Stark, Shannon, McHugh, J. Martin, Oberstar,

[Footnote continued on following page]

96-601 O-82-46

6

supports the Mathias and Edwards proposals because they embody the two basic principles that are essential to an even-handed solution to the home taping problem:

first, those whose copyrighted works are
being taped should be compensated in the
form of a reasonable royalty on the sale
of recording equipment and blank tape; and
second, consumers who tape for private,
noncommercial use in their homes should
not be liable for copyright infringement.

[Footnote continued]

Stokes, Loeffler, Beard, Benedict, Vento, Gejdenson, Mikulski, McKinney, G. Miller, Fish, Bingham, Fowler, Holland, Weiss, J. Edwards, Derrick, Simon, D. Evans, G. Brown, and Beilenson.

[blocks in formation]

It was not very many years ago that music could be communicated only in live performances; to experience the joy of music, one had to be there. But Thomas Edison's phonograph changed all that, and the rasping wax cylinder brought music into people's homes to be enjoyed at will. The miracle of radio made music even more widely available, delivering musical performances to homes the world over and, in the process, generating immeasurable goodwill abroad for our Nation and its people. In short, the advance of technology has made music accessible to all, enriching the lives of all who care to listen.

-

the

But the latest leap in technology development of sophisticated taping devices

[ocr errors][merged small]

to undermine the very existence of the creators who have filled the airwaves and record stores with music. That new technology enables the individual, in his or her own home, and at the push of a button, to capture a musical performance forever for free. Indeed, today one can build an entire library of recorded music without ever purchasing a single record. If the musical

-

arts are to maintain their vitality, this trend cannot

- 8

continue without an appropriate legislative response. Copyright law must keep pace with and accommodate itself to this latest technological development by protecting and preserving the right of copyright owners to fair

compensation.

This is not the first time that Congress has been called upon to save the rights of creators in the face of emerging technology. On prior occasions, Congress has developed imaginative responses to the challenge of protecting intellectual property rights while affording the public the benefits of the new technology (such as the advent of cable television and computer software). Congress faces that same type of challenge again today, this time to respond to the threat of home taping.

I. THE MASSIVE EXTENT OF HOME TAPING

Once a hobby pursued only by the serious

audiophile, there has been a veritable explosion of home taping in recent years. Today, some 39 million Americans spend over $600 million a year to engage in the home taping of music.

The economic basis of this phenomenon was explained in an article in Forbes magazine:

"With radio stations playing entire
albums without commercial breaks and
people trading records, taping is a
far cheaper alternative to buying
albums. A four-pack of Ampex tapes
sells for around $6.50 and can record
12 albums worth up to $72. Not
surprisingly, cassette sales are up
as much as 30%. More significantly,
imports of eight-track and cassette
recorders few are made in the U.S.
are up almost 18% this year."4/

[ocr errors]

No doubt, many radio broadcasters all over the Nation encourage home taping by playing new album releases in their entirety and without commercial interruption. It is, however, the increasing

sophistication and technical quality of taping equipment, and the relative ease with which it can be operated, that have made the rapid escalation of home taping possible. And with its declining price and growing popularity, this equipment is becoming increasingly accessible. In 1977, 71 million people

[ocr errors]

39 percent

of the U.S. population aged 10 or over

-

lived in homes

owning at least one piece of audio recording equipment.

By 1980, that number had grown by almost 20 million,

so that nearly half the U.S. population aged 10 or over had access to home tape recording

48 percent

-

-

4/ "Watching The Dollars," Forbes, Aug. 4, 1980, at

« PreviousContinue »