Structural Performance Evaluation of a Building SystemU.S. National Bureau of Standards, 1969 - 122 pages A full-scale, first-story portion of a building system was tested in the laboratory in such a manner as to simulate the structural behavior of a three-story building under both service and potential ultimate loading conditions.Additional tests were performed on the system components to provide behavioral data needed for the evaluation of the system.Performance criteria for the evaluation of the structural safety and adequacy of certain building systems were developed.This report presents the results of the physical tests performed in the evaluation of the safety and structural adequacy of one such system, and discusses their significance.The report also presents data concerning the complex interaction between components which takes place in the building system.(Author). |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page
... Figures 2222 - 0000000 영영 Structural Performance Evaluation. List of tables List of figures 1. Introduction 2. Objective and scope 3. Notation and conversion units 3.1 ... Figure Page Figure Page 5.1 . Typical complete structure 32.
... Figures 2222 - 0000000 영영 Structural Performance Evaluation. List of tables List of figures 1. Introduction 2. Objective and scope 3. Notation and conversion units 3.1 ... Figure Page Figure Page 5.1 . Typical complete structure 32.
Page
Edward Oscar Pfrang, Felix Y. Yokel. List of Figures 2222 - 0000000 영영 Structural Performance Evaluation of a Building System * Edward O. Figure Page Figure Page 5.1 . Typical complete structure 32 5.2 . Structural system model 32 5.3 ...
Edward Oscar Pfrang, Felix Y. Yokel. List of Figures 2222 - 0000000 영영 Structural Performance Evaluation of a Building System * Edward O. Figure Page Figure Page 5.1 . Typical complete structure 32 5.2 . Structural system model 32 5.3 ...
Page 6
... Figure 5.2 illustrates an assembled structural frame which contains all the precast components . The frame is illustrated in more detail in figure 5.3 . Figure 5.4 shows the erection of a frame . Figures 5.5 through 5.16 show detailed ...
... Figure 5.2 illustrates an assembled structural frame which contains all the precast components . The frame is illustrated in more detail in figure 5.3 . Figure 5.4 shows the erection of a frame . Figures 5.5 through 5.16 show detailed ...
Page 7
... figure 5.16 . These elements are standard , commercially available precast concrete roof tile . Concrete used in channel units consists of 3 / 8 - in maximum size lightweight aggregate ( " block - mix " ) . Air - dry unit weight of con ...
... figure 5.16 . These elements are standard , commercially available precast concrete roof tile . Concrete used in channel units consists of 3 / 8 - in maximum size lightweight aggregate ( " block - mix " ) . Air - dry unit weight of con ...
Page 8
... Figure 5.21 shows typical sections of an interior wall , and figure 5.22 shows a typical interior wall partially dismantled . 5.1.4 . Foundations , Grade Beams , and Slabs on Grade Foundation plans are shown in figure 5.23 . All ...
... Figure 5.21 shows typical sections of an interior wall , and figure 5.22 shows a typical interior wall partially dismantled . 5.1.4 . Foundations , Grade Beams , and Slabs on Grade Foundation plans are shown in figure 5.23 . All ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
0.12 VERTICAL DEFLECTION 1.7L Major floor applied initially axial load axis eccentricity building system center main beam CHANNEL 43 column connection Column loads computed creep Criterion curve cycles of loading deformation Exterior walls fire walls floor channels floor load versus floor slab ft² gross deflection H psf held constant HORIZONTAL TRANSLATION increments NOTES initially and held inserts laboratory lateral loads live load Load Computations load of 1.3D load versus beam load versus slab load versus translation load versus wall major axis Major floor load maximum measured midspan deflection minor axis oriented to permit Output Channel 72 precast components racking test reinforcement residual deflection simulated south wind load specimens steel struc superimposed load test on column test structure TIE BEAM tion topping slab versus beam deflection versus slab deflection versus wall compression vertical load versus vertical net deflection west wind load wind load versus
Popular passages
Page 2 - In recognition of the position of the United States as a signatory to the General Conference on Weights and Measures, which gave official status to the metric SI system of units in 1960...
Page 19 - ... margin. As a system, it exhibited strength and stiffness in excess of service and ultimate load requirements. (2) The walls of the system behaved as an integral part of the structure. They provided most of the stiffness of the system with respect to lateral loads, and provided a significant portion of the stiffness against vertical loads.