...agency and the applicant. (2) Evaluate the current status of the listed species or critical habitat. (3) Evaluate the effects of the action and cumulative...reasonable and prudent alternatives. (i) Incidental take. (1) In those cases where the Service concludes that an action (or the implementation of any reasonable...

...summary of the information on which the opinion is based; (2) A detailed discussion of the ef fects of the action on listed species or critical habitat;...shall include reasonable and prudent alternatives, if Joint Regulations on Endangered Species any. If the Service is unable to develop such alternatives,...

...action on listed species or critical habitat; and (3) The Service's opinion on whether the action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a...destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat (a "jeopardy biological opinion"); or, the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence...

...(ill) The Service will provide EPA a draft of a biological opinion finding that the FIFRA action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a...destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat, and describing any reasonable and prudent alternatives if available. (2) If the Service acts under...

...examination that insufficient information exists to conclude that an identified activity or program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence...result in the destruction or adverse modification of its critical habitat, the Federal agency will be so notified in writing within 60 days after formal...

...Director or Regional Director concludes from the threshold examination that the activity or program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence...result in the destruction or adverse modification of its critical habitat, the appropriate Federal agency shall be notified In writing within 60 days...

...Whenever the appropriate Area Manager, FWS, or Regional Director, NMFS, determines that the proposal is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a...result in the destruction or adverse modification of its critical habitat, the FmHA applicant shall be so informed and the project denied on this basis....

...Director or Regional Director concludes from the threshold examination that the activity or program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence...result in the destruction or adverse modification of its critical habitat, the appropriate Federal agency shall be notified in writing within 60 days...

...Director or Regional Director concludes from the threshold examination that the activity or program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence...result in the destruction or adverse modification of its critical habitat, the appropriate Federal agency shall be notified in writing within 60 days...

...to the proposed action. When the FWS opinion is received, if it should indicate the action would be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a...destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat, the action will be abandoned or altered as necessary. All procedures thus described are in compliance...