...necessary to protect and regulate interState commerce they may even regulate intra-State commerce. Wherever the inter-State and intra-State transactions...of carriers are so related that the government of one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe...

...opinion occurs this significant sentence : " Wherever the inter-State and intra-State transactions are so related that the government of the one involves...entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule." Aside from Government ownership, there seem to be four alternative ways by which the railways may be...

...such carriers from 'being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to the Federal care. "Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is enitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise...

...order the Supreme Court held that — Wherever the interstate ami iutrastate transactions of curriers are so related that the government of the one involves...final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would he denied the exercise of its constitutional authority, and the State, and not the Nation, would be...

...Texas By. v. United States, supra. In that case the court said : Wherever the interstate and intraatate .transactions of carriers are so related that the...the control of the other it is Congress and not the ttte that ia entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied...

...state to a point within the state was a discrimination against interstate commerce and it says that "wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...not the Nation, would be supreme within the national field." And further: "This is not to say that Congress possesses the authority to regulate the internal...

...Texas Ry. v. United States, 234 US 342, 58 L. ed. 1341; 84 Sup. Ct. 833. In that case the court said: "Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...not the nation would be supreme within the national field." Railroad Commission of Louisiana v. AHT Ry., 41 ICC 83, 121. (e) Duty of the Commission to...

...decree of the Commerce Court and sustaining the Commission's order the Supreme Court held that — Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme in the national field. The power to deal with the relation between intrastate and interstate rates,...

...the decree of the Commerce Court and sustaining the Commission's order the Supreme Court held that— Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme in the national field. The power to deal with the relation between intrastate and interstate rates,...

...of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the Interstate and Intrastate transactions...the government of the one Involves the control of tne other, it Is Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant...