California Law Review, Volume 12 |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accord action actual aliens amendment appears applied authority Bank become California called cause City Civil claim Code Commission common consideration considered Constitution constructive contract corporation course decided decision deed defendant determine doctrine effect equity established Estate evidence exercise existence express fact Federal give given grant ground Harvard Law Review held holding industry intended interest interstate commerce involved issue jurisdiction jury Justice land Law Review legislation liability limited matter means method military nature negligence notice officers operation opinion owner parties person plaintiff practice present principal purchaser question reason reference regulation relation respect result Roman rule seems Stats statute supra Supreme Court theory tion transfer trust United
Popular passages
Page 169 - No State shall engage in any war without the consent of the United States in Congress assembled, unless such State be actually invaded by enemies, or shall have received certain advice of a resolution being formed by some nation of Indians to invade such State, and the danger is so imminent as not to admit of a delay, till the United States in Congress assembled can be consulted...
Page 12 - Looking, then, to the common law, from whence came the right which the Constitution protects, we find that when private property is "affected with a public interest, it ceases to be juris privati only.
Page 117 - ... at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Page 198 - Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional authority and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme within the national field.
Page 56 - ... provided for in the will, or in such way mentioned therein as to show an intention not to make such provision; and no other evidence to rebut the presumption of such revocation can be received.
Page 199 - It shall be the duty of the various district attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures.
Page 175 - The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men at all times and under all circumstances.
Page 199 - Any person who shall, without just cause, fail or refuse to attend and testify or to answer any lawful inquiry or to produce books, papers...
Page 98 - Disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent behavior committed during the sitting of any court of justice, in immediate view and presence of the court, and directly tending to interrupt its proceedings or to impair the respect due to its authority; 2.
Page 120 - No act is a crime if the person who does it is at " the time when it is done prevented [either by defective " mental power or] by any disease affecting his mind...
Bibliographic information
| Title | California Law Review, Volume 12 |
| Contributors | University of California, Berkeley. School of Law, University of California (1868-1952). School of Jurisprudence, University of California, Berkeley. School of Jurisprudence |
| Publisher | School of Jurisprudence of the University of California, 1924 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |