 First, that in the absence of specific authority from Congress a State cannot by its legislation destroy the right of the United States, as the owner of lands bordering on a stream to the continued flow of its waters ; so far at least as may l)e necessary...  Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River Basin Compact and the Apalachicola ... - Page 8by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law - 2002 - 102 pagesFull view - About this book
 | 1906 - 1052 pages
...within its dominion undoubtedly belongs to each state, yet two limitations must be recoguized : First. That, in the absence of specific authority from Congress,...destroy the right of the United States, as the owner of lauds bordering on a stream, to the continued flow of its waters, so far at least as may be necessary... | |
 | 1915 - 880 pages
...within its dominion undoubtedly belongs to each state yet two limitations must be recognized: " i. That in the absence of specific authority from Congress...United States as the' owner of lands bordering on streams to the continued flow of its waters, so far at least as may be necessary for the beneficial... | |
 | 1904 - 868 pages
...not by its slation destroy the right of the Unite.1 State-, as the owner of lands bordering on trrum, to the continued flow of its waters, so far, at least, as may be necessary nr the lieneficial uses of the government property; second, that it is limited by the uperior power... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1901 - 298 pages
...to two limitations : First, that in the absence of fpecific authority from Congress, a State can not by its legislation destroy the right of the United States, as the owner of the lands bordering on a stream. to the continued flow of its waters: so far, at least, as may be neces... | |
 | Geological Survey (U.S.) - 1904 - 1190 pages
...must be recognized: First, that in the ataence of specific authority from Congress a Statt- «in not by its legislation destroy the right of the United States, as the owner of lands bordering on a ftrvain, to the continued How of its waters, so far, at least, as may be necessary for tho lieneficial... | |
 | Samuel Charles Wiel - 1905 - 678 pages
...within its dominion undoubtedly belongs to each State, yet two limitations must be recognized: First, that in the absence of specific authority from Congress...on a stream, to the continued flow of its waters"; adding at least as far as may be necessary for the beneficial uses of the government property, and... | |
 | John Bassett Moore - 1906 - 1036 pages
...however, subject to two limitations: (1) That without specific authority of Congress a State can not destroy the right of the United States as the owner of lands on a stream to the continued flow of the water, so far, at least, as may be essential to the beneficial... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1908 - 172 pages
...must be recognized: First, that in the absence of specific authority from Congress a State can not by its, legislation destroy the right of the United...lands bordering on a stream, to the continued flow of water; so far at least as may be necessary for the beneficial uses of the Government property. Second,... | |
 | 1910 - 770 pages
...must be recognized : First, that in the absence of specific authority from Congress a State can not by its legislation destroy the right of. the United...bordering on a stream, to the continued flow of its water ; so far at least as may be necessary for the beneficial uses of the government property. Second,... | |
 | 1910 - 1062 pages
...authority from COHLTC^ a State can not by its legislation destroy the right of the Fnited States, as tin' owner of lands bordering on a stream, to the continued flow of its water; so far at least as may be necessary for the beneficial use's of the government property. Secant),... | |
| |
