Page images
PDF
EPUB

§ 668.90 (a)(3)(i), the Secretary affirms that decision.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 18400537)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094)

[51 FR 43325, Dec. 1, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 45735, Dec. 1, 1987; 54 FR 24118, June 5, 1989; 54 FR 35189, Aug. 24, 1989, 56 FR 33342, July 19, 1991; 56 FR 36698, July 31, 1991]

§ 668.91 Verification of mailing and receipt dates.

(a) Verification of the Department of Education's mailing dates and receipt dates referred to in this subpart is evidenced by the original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service.

(b) If an institution refuses to accept a notice mailed under this subpart, the Secretary considers the notice as being received on the date that the institution refuses to accept the notice. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

[blocks in formation]

A limitation may include, as appropriate to the program in question

(a) A limit on the number or percentage of students enrolled in an institution who may receive Title IV. HEA program funds;

(b) A limit, for a stated period of time, on the percentage of an institution's total receipts from tuition and fees derived from Title IV, HEA program funds;

(c) A requirement that an institution obtain a bond, in a specified amount, to assure its ability to meet its finan

cial obligations to students who receive Title IV, HEA program funds; or (d) Other conditions as may be determined by the Secretary to be reasonable and appropriate.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

§ 668.94 Termination.

(a) A termination—

(1) Ends an institution's eligibility to participate in any or all of the Title IV, HEA programs;

(2) Prohibits an institution or the Secretary from making or increasing Title IV, HEA program awards;

(3) Prohibits an institution from making any other new obligations against Title IV, HEA program funds; and

(4) Prohibits further guarantee commitments by the Secretary under the Guaranteed Student Loan or PLUS programs for loans to students to attend that institution, and prohibits further disbursements by an institution which is a lender under the Guaranteed Student Loan or PLUS programs (whether or not guarantee commitments have been issued by the Secretary or a guarantee agency for such disbursements):

(b) If an institution is terminated during a payment period, any student at the institution who has received an award or to whom a commitment has been made before the effective date of the termination may receive a payment for that payment period.

(c) For purposes of this section, a commitment

(1) Under the Pell Grant and Campus-based programs, is defined in § 668.25 and

(2) Under the Guaranteed Student Loan and PLUS programs, occurs when the Secretary or a guarantee agency advises the lender that the loan will be guaranteed.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

§ 668.95 Reimbursements, refunds and offsets.

(a) The designated department official, administrative law judge or Secretary may require an institution to take reasonable and appropriate corrective action to remedy a violation of appli

cable laws, regulations, special arrangements, agreements or limitations.

(b) The corrective action may include payment of any funds to the Secretary, or to designated recipients, which the institution improperly received, withheld, disbursed or caused to be disbursed. Corrective action may, for example, relate to

(1) With respect to the Guaranteed Student Loan or PLUS programs

(i) Ineligible interest benefits, special allowances or other claims paid by the Secretary; and

(ii) Discounts, premiums or excess interest paid in violations of part 682 of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and

(2) With respect to all Title IV, HEA programs

(i) Refunds due to students under program regulations; and

(ii) Any grants, work-study assistance or loans made in violation of program regulations.

(c) If any final decision requires an institution to reimburse or make any other payment to the Secretary, the Secretary may offset these claims against any benefits or claims due to the institution.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

[51 FR 43325, Dec. 1, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 36699, July 31, 1991]

§ 668.96 Reinstatement after termination. (a)(1) An institution whose eligibility to participate in any or all of the Title IV, HEA programs has been terminated may file a request for reinstatement as a participating eligible institution.

(2) Except for an institution that has been terminated for engaging in substantial misrepresentation concerning the nature of its educational program, the nature of its financial charges or the employability of its graduates, a request for reinstatement may not be made before the expiration of 18 months after the effective date of the termination.

(3) An institution whose eligibility to participate was terminated because the institution engaged in substantial misrepresentation may not request reinstatement before the expiration of

[blocks in formation]

§ 668.97

Removal of limitation.

(a) An institution whose eligibility to participate in any or all Title IV, HEA programs has been limited may not apply for removal of the limitation of its eligibility to participate before the expiration of 12 months from the effective date of the limitation.

(b) After the minimum limitation period, the institution may request removal of the limitation. The request must be in writing and show that the institution has corrected the violations on which the limitation was based.

(c) No later than 60 days after the receipt of the request, the Secretary responds to the institution

(1) Granting its request;

(2) Denying its request; or

(3) Granting the request subject to other limitation(s).

[blocks in formation]

(e) The institution's request for a show cause meeting does not waive its right to participate in any or all Title IV, HEA programs if it complies with the continuing limitation(s) pending the outcome of the meeting.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

Subpart H-Appeal Procedures · for Audit Determinations and Program Review Determinations

SOURCE: 52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987, correctly designated at 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987, unless otherwise noted.

§ 668.111 Scope and purpose.

(a) This subpart establishes rules governing the appeal of an institution from a final audit determination or a final program review determination arising from an audit or program review of the institution's participation in any student financial assistance program authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). (The Title IV, HEA programs are listed in § 668.1(c)).

(b) This subpart applies to any institution (as defined in § 668.1(b)) that appeals a final audit determination or final program review determination.

(c) This subpart does not apply to proceedings governed by Subpart G of this part or to a determination that

(1) An institution fails to meet the applicable statutory definition set forth in sections 435, 481, or 1201 of the HEA, except to the extent that such a determination forms the basis of a final audit determination or a final program review determination; or

(2) An institution fails to qualify for certification to participate in the Title IV, HEA programs because it does not meet the fiscal and administrative standards set forth in Subpart B of this part, except to the extent that such a determination forms the basis of a final audit determination or a program review determination.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

[blocks in formation]

the responsibilities referred to in this subpart.

"Final audit determination" means the written notice of a determination issued by a designated ED official based on an audit of an institution's participation in any or all of the Title IV, HEA programs covered under this subpart.

"Final program review determination" means the written notice of a determination issued by a designated ED official and resulting from a program compliance review of an institution's participation in any or all of the Title IV, HEA programs covered under this subpart.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

§ 668.113 Request for review.

(a) An institution seeking the Secretary's review of a final audit determination or a final program review determination shall file a written request for review with the designated ED official issuing the final audit determination or final program review determination.

(b) The institution shall file its request for review and any records or materials admissible under the terms of §§ 668.116 (e) and (f) of this subpart, no later than 45 days from the date it receives the final audit determination or final program review determination.

(c) The institution shall attach to the request for review a copy of the final audit determination or final program review determination, and shall

(1) Identify the issues and facts in dispute; and

(2) State the institution's position together with the pertinent facts and reasons supporting that position.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 18400592)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

[52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987; 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987]

§ 668.114 Notification of hearing.

(a) Upon receipt of an institution's request for review, the designated ED official arranges for a hearing on the

record before an administrative law judge.

(b) Within 30 days of the designated ED official's receipt of an institution's request for review, the administrative law judge establishes a schedule for the submission of briefs by both the institution and the designated ED official.

(c) The submission of briefs and of accompanying evidence admissible under the terms of §§ 668.116 (e) and (f) shall be scheduled to occur no later than 120 days from the date upon which the administrative law judge notifies the institution under paragraph (b) of this section.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

[52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987; 52 FR 32868, Aug. 31, 1987; 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987]

§ 668.115 Prehearing conference.

(a) In the event that the administrative law judge considers a prehearing conference necessary, he may convene a prehearing conference.

(b) The purpose of a prehearing conference is to allow the parties to settle or narrow the dispute. A prehearing conference consists of

(1) A telephone conference call;

(2) An informal meeting of the parties with the administrative law judge;

or

(3) The submission and exchange of written materials by the parties.

(c) All prehearing conferences requiring appearances by the parties shall take place in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

§ 668.116 Hearing on the record.

(a) A hearing on the record is a process conducted by the administrative law judge whereby an orderly presentation of arguments and evidence is made by the parties.

(b) The hearing process consists of the submission of written briefs to the administrative law judge by the institution and by the designated ED official, unless the administrative law judge determines, under paragraph (g) of this section, that an oral hearing is also necessary.

(c) Each party shall provide a copy of its brief and any accompanying ma

terials to the opposing party simultaneously with the filing of its brief and materials with the administrative law judge.

(d) An institution requesting review of the final audit determination or final program review determination issued by the designated ED official shall have the burden of proving the following matters, as applicable—

(1) That expenditures questioned or disallowed were proper;

(2) That the institution complied with program requirements.

(e)(1) A party may submit as evidence to the administrative law judge only materials within one or more of the following categories:

(i) ED audit reports and audit work papers for audits performed by the United States Education Department Office of Inspector General.

(ii) Institutional audit work papers, records, and other materials, if the institution provide those work papers, records, or materials to ED no later than the date by which it was required to file its request for review in accordance with § 668.113.

(iii) ED program review reports and work papers for program reviews.

(iv) Institutional records and other materials provided to ED in response to a program review, if the records or materials were provided to ED by the institution no later than the date by which it was required to file its request for review in accordance with §668.113.

(v) Other ED records and materials if the records and materials were proIvided to the administrative law judge no later than 30 days after the institution's filing of its request for review.

(2) A party desiring to submit as evidence any materials described in paragraph (e)(1) of this section shall submit that evidence with its initial brief.

(f) The administrative law judge shall accept only evidence that is both admissible and timely under the terms of paragraph (e) of this section, and relevant and material to the appeal. Examples of evidence which shall be deemed irrelevant and immaterial except upon a clear showing of probative value respecting the matters described in paragraph (d) include—

(1) Evidence relating to a period of time other than the period of timecovered by the audit or program review;

(2) Evidence relating to an audit or program review of an institution other than the institution bringing the appeal, or the resolution thereof; and (3) Evidence relating to the current practice of the institution bringing the appeal in the program areas at issue in the appeal.

(g)(1) The administrative law judge may schedule an oral argument if he determines that an oral argument is necessary to clarify the issues and the positions of the parties as presented in the parties' written submissions.

(2) In the event that an oral argument is conducted, the designated ED official shall make a transcribed record of the proceedings and shall make that record available to the institution upon its request and upon its payment of a fee consistent with that prescribed under the Department of Education Freedom of Information Act regulations (34 CFR Part 5).

(h) Any oral argument shall take place in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

(i) Either party may be represented by counsel.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

[52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987; 52 FR 32868, Aug. 31, 1987; 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987]

§ 668.117 Authority and responsibilities of the administrative law judge.

(a) The administrative law judge regulates the course of the proceedings and the conduct of the parties following a request for review and takes all steps necessary to conduct fair and impartial proceedings.

(b) The administrative law judge is not authorized to issue subpoenas or compel discovery as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(c) The administrative law judge shall take whatever measures are appropriate to expedite the proceedings. These measures may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following:

(1) Scheduling of conferences. (2) Setting time limits for oral arguments and the submission of briefs.

(3) Terminating the hearing process and issuing a decision against a party if that party does not meet time limits established by the administrative law judge.

(d) The administrative law judge is bound by all applicable statutes and regulations. The administrative law judge may not

(1) Waive applicable statutes and regulations; or

(2) Rule them invalid. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

§ 668.118 Decision of the administrative law judge.

(a) Upon review of the parties' written submissions and termination of the oral argument if one is held, the administrative law judge issues a written decision.

(b) The administrative law judge's decision states and explains whether the final audit determination or final program review determination issued by the designated ED official was supportable, in whole or in part.

(c) The administrative law judge bases any findings of fact only on evidence properly presented before him, on matters given official notice, or on facts stipulated to by the parties.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)

§ 668.119 Appeal to the Secretary.

(a) Within 15 days of its receipt of the initial decision of the administrative law judge, a party wishing to appeal the decision shall submit a brief or other written material to the Secretary explaining why the decision of the administrative law judge should be overturned or modified.

(b) The party appealing the initial decision shall, simultaneously with its filing of the appeal, provide the opposing party with a copy of its brief or other written material.

(c) In its brief to the Secretary, the party appealing the initial decision may submit proposed findings of fact or conclusions of law. However, the proposed findings of fact must be supported by

(1) The admissible evidence already in the record;

« PreviousContinue »