| Kenneth L. Smith - 1967 - 188 pages
...question in terms of what is ethically and esthetically right, as well as what is economically expedient. A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the . . . community of all living things. It is wrong when it tends otherwise. Saving the free-flowing... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works - 1978 - 1810 pages
...question in Urma of what is ethically and esthetically right, aa well aa what Is economically expedient. A thing is right when It tends to preserve the Integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotlc community. It la wrong when it tends otherwise." Thank you Mr. Chairman for thia opportunity... | |
| J. Baird Callicott - 1987 - 322 pages
...ethically and esthetically right, as well as what is economically expedient. A thing is right only when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community, and the community includes the soil, waters, fauna, and flora, as well as people." This,... | |
| Holmes Rolston - 2012 - 408 pages
...there is nothing to celebrate. Is There No Beauty at All in Nature? "A thing is right," said Leopold, "when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community." Immanuel Kant cautioned that in appreciating natural beauty we ought not to assume that nature has... | |
| Roderick Frazier Nash - 1989 - 306 pages
...membership of humans and other life-forms in one community. The 1947 version reads: "A thing is right only when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community, and the community includes the soil, waters, fauna, and flora, as well as people." Extensive... | |
| |