Tapscott, Adm'r, et al. adv. Linthicum, Ex'r, et al. Vance, Ex'r, adv. Swayne .. Van De Griff, Sheriff, v. Haynie et al .... 282 270 Whitehead and wife v. Ark. Cent. R. R. Co... 460 The following cases are not deemed of sufficient importance to warrant their insertion and are, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice, omitted, 'viz.: Carney et al. v. McGehee. Cohn & Bosley v. Martin & Co. Corwine v. Lyman. Day v. The State. Earle et al. v. Brown et al. Edrington, Adm'r, v. Driver. Gentry, Campbell & Co. v. M. & L. R. R. Co. Goodwin v. Hovis, Sheriff. Harbison & Pryor v. Lillard. Hodges & Weeks v. Stillwell, Ex'r. Hurd v. Roleson et al. Jocks v. Barrow, Sheriff. Lavender, Adm'r, v. Thompson et al. Leeder v. Clinton. McNeal v. Sandford et al. Mitchell v. Edrington. Murphy, Adm'r, v. Roleson & Allen. Ramsour et al. v. Harbison, Coll'r. Smith v. The State. Stark, Stauffer & Co. v. Vangilder, Adm'r, etc. State ex rel. Brooks v. Page, Treasurer. State v. Lance. Vandermark v. The State. Watkins v. Prairie Co. Wheeler v. Whytock. Wood v. The State. Wright v. Walker, et al. Kiernan v. Blackwell, Adm'r, et al., 27 Ark., 235, was decided by MORSE, Circuit Judge, and not by the Hon. Wм. M. HARRISON, as is there stated. |