Page images
PDF
EPUB

40

SWITZERLAND

Third party liability resulting from nuclear power plant operation

is defined in the Ordinance of November 30, 1981. Pursuant to article 1 of

this Ordinance, the amount of insurance for such a liability is limited to

300 million Swiss francs.

Prepared by Miklos K. Radvanyi
Senior Legal Specialist

European Law Division

Law Library, Library of Congress
February 1984

7/1 Systematische Sammlung des Bundesrechts 732.44.

41

TURKEY

Turkey is a party to the Convention on Third Party Liability

in the Field of Nuclear Energy of 1960 which was ratified by Law No. 299

of May 8, 1961.

1/

According to the above-mentioned law and the Regulations for
the aggregate compensation

2/

Licensing Procedure for Nuclear Institutions,

required to be paid for damage caused by a nuclear incident can not exceed

the amount equivalent to 15,000,000 European monetary agreement units of 3/

account.

Prepared by Belma Bayar

Legal Specialist

Near Eastern and African Law Division

Law Library, Library of Congress

February, 1984

1/ T.C. Resmi Gazete [Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, hereafter TUR OG), No. 10806 (May 13, 1961), p. 4081-4085.

2/ Article 7, id at 4082 and Article 7 of Decree 8/7405 of November 18, 1983 in TUR OG No. 18256 (December 18, 1983), p. 3.

3/ A European Monetary Agreement unit equivalent to approximately 8.85.

[blocks in formation]

SUBJECT: Industry-Protective Limitations on Liability in Federal

[ocr errors][merged small]

This memorandum responds to your request for a listing of liability
limitations in federal law, with a comparison to the liability limitation in
the Price-Anderson Act. That Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2210, sets a floating liability
ceiling as to parties responsible for injury to the public in a nuclear incident.
Research was confined to those liability limitations offering some

parallel to that in the Price-Anderson Act, namely, limitations on the dollar
liability of a commercial entity for injury caused by that entity. This rule
leads to our exclusion of the following types of provisions, despite their
arguable status as "liability limitations":

ceilings on fines/penalties

limits on available government insurance/loan guarantees

limits on government liability per agreement with private party
limits on shareholder liability

limits on liability of credit card holders for unauthorized use
bars on bringing certain types of actions against specified parties

33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq.

The Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act governs the
liability of employers for job-related injury to maritime employees. The Act
specifies a fixed-dollar-amount liability for each of several types of injury,
and, importantly here, stipulates that such liability "shall be exclusive and
in place of all other liability of such employer." Id. at 905.

33 U.S.C. § 1321

Liability

Section 311 of the Clean Water Act bans the discharge of oil and
hazardous substances into the navigable waters of the United States.
of the discharger for federal cleanup costs may not exceed

-

CRS-2

the greater of $125 per gross ton or $125,000, for
inland barges

the greater of $150 per gross ton or $250,000, for

any other vessels

$50 million for onshore and offshore facilities

Similar liability limits are established for third parties. The President is permitted to set liability limits of less than $50 million for onshore and offshore facilities.

Liability limits do not apply where the United States shows that the discharge was the result of "willful negligence or willful misconduct within the privity and knowledge of the owner.

33 U.S.C. § 1517

[ocr errors]

Section 18 of the Deepwater Port Act governs liability for oilspills in the vicinity of deepwater ports licensed under the Act. Liability of the discharger for oilspill damage and cleanup costs may not exceed

the lesser of $150 per gross ton or $20 million,
for vessels

$50 million for deepwater port licensees

-

Liability limits do not apply if it can be shown that the discharge was the result of "gross negligence or willful misconduct within the privity and knowledge" of the vessel owner/operator or port licensee.

42 U.S.C. § 247b(k)

To protect manufacturers of swine flu vaccine from liability for personal injury or death arising from administering the vaccine, other than that arising from the manufacturer's negligence or departure from contract terms, the United States agrees to stand in the shoes of the manufacturer for litigation purposes. The United States is thus to be liable under any applicable theory of state law negligence, strict liability, etc.

42 U.S.C. § 9607(c)

-

Section 107 (c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act is concerned with the liability of generators, transporters, and disposers of hazardous substances for cleanup costs and injury to certain natural resources. Such liability may not exceed

the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5 million, for
vessels carrying hazardous substances

the greater of $300 per gross ton or $500,000, for any

vessel other than those specified immediately above

$50 million (or a lesser amount established by the President),

for any motor vehicle, aircraft, pipeline, or rolling

stock

all costs of response plus $50 million for any natural resources
damage, for any facility other than those specified immed-
iately above

Liability limits do not apply if the hazardous substance was released as the result of "willful misconduct or willful negligence," or a safety standard violation, "within the privity or knowledge" of the responsible person. The limits also do not apply where such person fails to cooperate with certain governmental cleanup activities.

CRS-3

43 U.S.C. § 1653

Section 204 of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline (TAP) Authorization Act stipulates that the liability of the pipeline right-of-way holder to injured parties is limited to $50 million of strict liability, further liability to be established under ordinary rules of negligence.

Similarly, the liability of a vessel carrying TAP oil for injuries and cleanup costs is capped at $14 million of strict liability. (The TAP Fund covers the next $86 million of damage awards, also with strict liability. Beyond this amount, claims are to be litigated under other federal or state law.)

43 U.S.C. § 1814(b)

Section 304(b) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Amendments of 1978 addresses liability for oilspill-related injury in connection with offshore facilities and vessels transporting oil from those facilities. may not exceed

Such liability

the greater of $300 per gross ton or $250,000, for a vessel
the total of removal and cleanup costs, "and an amount limited

to $35 million for all damages"

[ocr errors]

Liability limits do not apply when the incident "is caused primarily by willful misconduct or gross negligence," or a safety standard violation, "within the privity or knowledge or the owner or operator." The liability limit for vessels also does not apply when the owner/operator fails to cooperate with federal cleanup efforts.

46 U.S.C. §§ 181-196

The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 provides that a vessel owner's liability for any loss of cargo on board, damage by collision, or any other loss or damage shall not exceed "the amount or value of the interest of such owner in such vessel, and her freight then pending."

The liability limit does not apply where the acts or omissions causing the loss or damage are within "the privity or knowledge" of the vessel owner.

Warsaw Convention

This treaty, as supplemented by the "Montreal Agreement" (CAB Agreement 18900, approved by Order E-23680, May 13, 1966), limits the liability of air carriers on international flights to $75,000 per passenger in cases of passenger injury or death. It also sets forth liability limits for baggage and

cargo.

The liability limit does not apply where the carrier fails to post notice of it, or where there is willful misconduct.

The key distinction between the liability limitation in the PriceAnderson Act and those in the listed statutes is the absence of any exception to the limitation in Price-Anderson. Most other federal statutes strip a defendant of the liability-limitation shield under certain conditions, typically where there is willful misconduct, gross negligence, or the like. By contrast,

« PreviousContinue »