Compulsory Insurance and Compensation for Bunker Oil Pollution DamageSpringer Science & Business Media, 2007 M03 20 - 242 pages Oil tankers are not the only vessels that have caused oil pollution at sea. Numerous spills in the past have been of heavy fuel oil from non-tankers. However, the international liability and compensation regime covered only oil pollution damage caused by oil tankers. There was thus a need to bring the law on marine oil pollution responsive to oil pollution damage caused by non-tankers. In March 2001, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage was adopted following a diplomatic conference at the International Maritime Organization. Though this convention has not yet come into force, its various aspects should already be considered as they will surely affect the maritime industry as a whole and the non-tanker sector, in particular. This book provides a timely and comprehensive study on the concept of compulsory insurance, its main purpose of ensuring compensation and its interrelations with other features such as the rule of strict liability and the limitation of liability under the convention. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 84
... ............................................................ persons............................ ................................... 128 129 129 130 131 132 133 134 136 136 2. Bareboat charterer ......................
... Library: The Ratification of Maritime Conventions (2004), Vol.4, II.7.30, II.7.51, II.7.90 and II.7.111. persons involved to a uniform set of legal rules. Strict Introduction Pollution damage arising from a bunker-oil spill.
... persons involved in being liable for oil pollution damage from ships' bunkers. There, thus, remains a gap in the otherwise comprehensive international regime of liability and compensation for oil pollution from ships. Due to the absence ...
... persons who suffer damage caused by oil spills when the oil is carried as fuel in ships ' bunkers . By covering all non - tanker vessels , the Convention fills in the last significant gap left in an otherwise well- established ...
... persons who suffered damage caused by pollution resulting from the escape or discharge of persistent hydrocarbon mineral oil from ships . This aspect has already been covered in a vast amount of literature and this research confines ...
Contents
7 | |
I | 19 |
10 | 29 |
13 | 40 |
The Birth of Compulsory Insurance for Oil Pollution | 49 |
20 | 52 |
Possible | 55 |
d The International Group of PI Clubs II The insurers offering coverage for oilpollution liability | 66 |
Port State control regarding | 118 |
Operator | 139 |
Limitation of Liability and the Limit of Insurance | 145 |
Limitation of Liability | 165 |
Introduction | 171 |
The limited effect of direct action under PI insurance | 178 |
Interpretation of wilful misconduct in insurance | 188 |
F Recourse | 196 |
Strict Liability and Insurance | 81 |
Who shall be liable? | 93 |
67 | 95 |
c The role of the PI Club with regard to an oil | 102 |
Channelling | 103 |
insurance | 105 |
Insurance and the Quest for Adequate Compensation | 110 |
Oil | 199 |
maintaining their sustainable development III Shipowners the central actor | 203 |
A The concept of compulsory insurance and its compensation | 211 |
Text of the Bunkers | 227 |
Index 239 | 238 |
B The global limitation of liability system in relation to Limitation of liability rule in general ships | 240 |
Other editions - View all
Compulsory Insurance and Compensation for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage Ling Zhu No preview available - 2006 |
Compulsory Insurance and Compensation for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage Ling Zhu No preview available - 2009 |