National Health Program: Hearings Before the Committee on Education and Labor, United States Senate, Seventy-ninth Congress, Second Session, on S. 1606, a Bill to Provide for a National Health Program ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administration agencies American Medical Association BECKER believe benefits Blue Cross CHAIRMAN Chicago Medical Society citizens compulsory health insurance Congress Congressman BIEMILLER Council DAVIS Democratic Action dental Dies committee director disability doctors economic Education and Labor employees facilities fact families favor Federal Security Agency FROTHINGHAM funds Government Granville Hicks Group Health Association health bill hearings hospital Illinois Illinois Medical Society illness income individual insurance plans legislation LINFORD Louis Fraina medical profession medical service plan meet membership ment National Health Act national health program National Physicians Committee Office patient payment percent persons physicians population practice prepayment plans present president problem professional proposed question represent Senator DONNELL Senator Murray service plan corporation sickness social security sponsor statement Surgeon tion Union for Democratic United United States Senate veterans voluntary plans Wagner-Murray-Dingell bill Waldo Frank Washington workers York
Popular passages
Page 2615 - labor dispute' includes any controversy concerning terms, tenure or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing, or seeking to arrange terms or conditions of employment, regardless of whether the disputants stand in the proximate relation of employer and employee.
Page 2615 - A case shall be held to involve or to grow out of a labor dispute when the case involves persons who are engaged in the same industry, trade, craft, or occupation ; or have direct or indirect interests therein; or who are employees of the same employer ; or who are members of the same or an affiliated organization of employers or employees...
Page 2921 - Lord: 15 looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; " lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. " For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.
Page 2921 - And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom.
Page 2525 - If any provision of this Act is declared unconstitutional or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act and the applicability of such provisions to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Page 2615 - That no restraining order or injunction shall be granted by any court of the United States, or a judge or the judges thereof, in any case between an employer and employees, or between employers and employees, or between employees, or between persons employed and persons seeking employment, involving, or growing out of it, a dispute concerning terms or conditions of employment...
Page 2805 - None of this is really new. The American people are the most insurance-minded people in the world. They will not be frightened off from health insurance because some people have misnamed it "socialized medicine." I repeat — what I am recommending is not socialized medicine. Socialized medicine means that all doctors work as employees of government. The American people want no such system. No such system is here proposed.
Page 2615 - ... unit. These independent physicians, and the two petitioning associations which represent them, were interested solely in preventing the operation of a business conducted in corporate form by Group Health. In this aspect the case is very like Columbia Hirer Packers Ansociation, Inc.. v. Hinton, 315 IT. S. 143. What was there decided requires a holding that the petitioners' activities were not exempted by the Clayton and the Norris-LaGuardia Acts from the operation of the Sherman Act.
Page 2534 - ... between one or more employers or associations of employers and one or more employees or associations of employees; (2) between one or more employers or associations of employers and one or more employers or associations of employers; or (3) between one or more employees or associations of employees and one or more employees or associations of employees; or when the case involves any conflicting or competing interests in a "labor dispute" (as hereinafter defined) of "persons participating or interested"...
Page 2534 - ... interests therein; or who are employees of the same employer ; or who are members of the same or an affiliated organization of employers or employees ; whether such dispute is (1) between one or more employers or associations of employers and one or more employees or...