No. 975, Misc. JONES V. VIRGINIA. Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied. Robert Lee Watt and Robert L. Murphy for petitioner. Ralph G. Louk and Donald C. Crounse for respondent.

No. 373, Misc. CARNEY V. LAVALLEE, WARDEN. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Linkletter v. Walker, ante, p. 640. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Barry Mahoney, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

No. 612, Misc. BERMAN v. FAY, WARDEN. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Linkletter v. Walker, ante, p. 640. Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

No. 513, Misc. CRAWFORD V. BANNAN, WARDEN. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari and other relief denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Linkletter v. Walker, ante, p. 640. Petitioner pro se. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and James R. Ramsey, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Erwin Ellmann for the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition. Reported below: 336 F.2d 505.

No. 1169, Misc. ROBERTS v. NEW YORK. App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Douglas A. Jacobsen for petitioner.

No. 748, Misc. SOUTHERLAND V. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied without prejudice to an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the appropriate United States District Court. Chester E. Wallace for petitioner. Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, and Peyton S. Hawes, Jr., and Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

Rehearing Denied.

No. 123. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION V. UNION ELECTRIC CO., ante, p. 90;

No. 363. SIMONS v. MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK, EXECUTOR, ante, p. 81;

No. 871. CAUER ET AL. v. BRENNER, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, 380 U. S. 953;

No. 899. U. S. 979;

MURPHY OIL CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 380

No. 924. ALLEGRETTI v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 911; No. 925. DARLAK V. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 911; No. 952. SPOMAR v. UNITED STATES, 380 U. S. 975; No. 956. UNITED PACKINGHOUSE, FOOD & ALLIED WORKERS, AFL-CIO v. WILSON & Co., Inc., 380 U. S. 976; No. 977. BENDELARI V. UNITED STATES, 380 U. S. 978; No. 988. ALLIED CENTRAL STORES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ante, p. 903; No. 991. SUMMERLIN v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 903; No. 1013. SCHWARTZ V. TANNER, ante, p. 904; No. 1094. ATWOOD ET AL. v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING Co., ante, p. 926; and

No. 237, Misc. STEPHENS v. TEXAS, 380 U. S. 980. Petitions for rehearing denied.

381 U.S.

No. 481, Misc.

No. 932, Misc.

June 7, 1965.

BRADY V. OHIO, ante, p. 904;

FERGUSON V. GEORGIA, ante, p. 905; No. 982, Misc. EVANS v. KATZENBACH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., ante, p. 920;

No. 994, Misc. ALLEN V. HOFFIUS ET AL., ante, p. 274; and

No. 1050, Misc. SANTOS v. CALIFORNIA, ante, p. 919. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Peti

No. 202. GRIFFIN V. CALIFORNIA, 380 U. S. 609. tion for rehearing denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

No. 677, Misc. LAWSON v. UNITED STATES, 380 U. S. 919, 989. Motion for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.

958

INDEX

ACCESSORIES. See Constitutional Law, III, 4.

ACCRETION. See also Submerged Lands Act of 1953.

State sovereignty over new land-Artificial accretion to shoreline.—
The sovereignty of the States extends to new land obtained by arti-
ficial accretion as well as natural modification of the shoreline.
United States v. California, p. 139.

ACQUIESCENCE. See Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Taxes.
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. See Federal Communications
Commission; Judicial Review, 1.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. See also Federal Trade Com-
mission, 1, 3-4; Judicial Review, 2; Natural Gas Act.

Federal Power Commission-Reconsideration on remand.-The
FPC was free in considering the question of production costs on
remand to reconsider its initial erroneous position on the jurisdictional
question. United Gas Co. v. Continental Oil Co., p. 392.

AFFIDAVITS. See Statute of Limitations.

AIR NATIONAL GUARD. See National Guard.

AIRPLANES. See National Guard.

ALASKA. See Procedure, 2.

ALIMONY. See Constitutional Law, V; Dower.

ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Federal Trade Commission, 1, 3-4;
Judicial Review, 2; Labor, 1-2.

1. Clayton Act-Statute of limitations-Private antitrust suits.—
Absent any specific legislative history on the inclusion of Federal
Trade Commission actions within the tolling provisions of §5 (b)
of the Clayton Act, the issue is resolved by reliance on the clear con-
gressional intention that private suitors be given the benefits of prior
government actions, which would necessarily include Commission
proceedings. Minnesota Mining v. N. J. Wood Co., p. 311.

2. Sherman Act-Efforts to influence public officials.-Concerted
efforts to influence public officials do not violate the antitrust laws
even though intended to eliminate competition, and respondents were
entitled to no damages under the Sherman Act as a result of actions
of the Secretary of Labor. Mine Workers v. Pennington, p. 657.