Radiation protection: hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session, April 18, 19, and July 13, 1978U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 76
Page 6
... reason- able , or capable of being implemented . On the basis of hearings and comments received , EPA made changes in the standard which deleted the transportation area of the uranium fuel cycle , extended the time period for ...
... reason- able , or capable of being implemented . On the basis of hearings and comments received , EPA made changes in the standard which deleted the transportation area of the uranium fuel cycle , extended the time period for ...
Page 14
... reasons , all parts of the EPA's nuclear power operations standard will not be effective until January 1983 . Some areas such as mining the uranium ore , transporting the radioactive materials , and disposing of the waste were deleted ...
... reasons , all parts of the EPA's nuclear power operations standard will not be effective until January 1983 . Some areas such as mining the uranium ore , transporting the radioactive materials , and disposing of the waste were deleted ...
Page 19
... reasons for the abolishment of the former Radiation Council . We were informed that its functions were transferred to EPA on the basis that an independent agency would give greater attention to the importance of setting environmental ...
... reasons for the abolishment of the former Radiation Council . We were informed that its functions were transferred to EPA on the basis that an independent agency would give greater attention to the importance of setting environmental ...
Page 23
... reasons for society to attempt health benefit / cost analysis for major technological applications involving radiation exposure of the population in comparison with feasible alternatives which involve less or no radiation exposure ...
... reasons for society to attempt health benefit / cost analysis for major technological applications involving radiation exposure of the population in comparison with feasible alternatives which involve less or no radiation exposure ...
Page 36
... reason to expect that over the next few decades , the dose commitments for all man- made sources of radiation except medical should not exceed more than a few millirems average annual dose to the entire U. S. popula- tion . The present ...
... reason to expect that over the next few decades , the dose commitments for all man- made sources of radiation except medical should not exceed more than a few millirems average annual dose to the entire U. S. popula- tion . The present ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activities Administrator Atomic Energy authority believe Bureau of Radiological cancer CFR Part 190 Chairman Clean Air Act Committee concern Congress cooperation coordination Department dose rates DRINAN efforts environment Environmental Protection Agency environmental radiation EPA's ESCHWEGE established exposed facilities Federal agencies Federal Radiation Council Federal radiation protection GERUSKY Government guidelines hazards health effects impact implementation interagency ionizing radiation issue levels limits medical radiation Memorandum of Understanding monitoring NCRP NIOSH nonionizing radiation nuclear fuel cycle nuclear power Nuclear Regulatory Commission nuclear waste occupational operating plants plutonium population problems proposed standard public health questions radiation exposure radiation programs radiation protection programs radiation standards radioactive materials radioactive waste Radiological Health reactors recommendations regulations reprocessing responsibility risk role RYAN scientific sources specific staff studies subcommittee tion uranium fuel cycle waste workers x-ray