A Model for Communication about BiotechnologyThis book incorporates two major themes into a model for communication about biotechnology. The first is that of a communicating community, defined as a relatively coherent social group engaging in communication within itself. As biotechnologists do not constitute a unitary group, this book refers to biotechnology communities. Similarly, the broad notion of 'the public' is considered to be inadequate, and the notion of distinct public communities is used. The members of each community are considered to have a view of biotechnology made up of their understandings of the nature of science of biotechnology, understandings of the key concepts and models used in biotechnology, perceptions of the nature of risk, and beliefs and attitudes about biotechnology. The second major theme is that of search space. This is the intersection, in a virtual arena, of the components of the 'views' of two communities. Where there are elements that are in common to the two, communication in terms of them is possible. Where there is no commonality, the degrees of understanding reached must be used to construct a mutual understanding that may evolve into an agreement. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
CHAPTER | 13 |
CHAPTER 3 | 23 |
CHAPTER 5 | 51 |
Appendix A | 63 |
Appendix B | 69 |
Appendix C | 79 |
Appendix D | 89 |
Appendix E | 97 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptance activities adult analysis animal applications approach argument Association attempt attitudes bacteria beliefs benefits biotechnology biotechnology community cloning communication companies components concerns considered countries crops debate demonstrated discourse discussion Education effects Eichelbaum embryo environment environmental established etal ethical evidence example existing experiments explanation expression field foods genes genetic engineering genetic modification genre GM foods GMOs groups human human cloning ideas identified impacts important improved individuals interest involved issues Journal knowledge legislation meaning nature occur organisms participants particular Party patent perception plants possible potential present problems protection questions range reproductive resistance response result risk role Royal Commission scientific scientists significant situation social Society space specific stem cells suggest techniques tissue transfer transgenic trust types understanding University Zealand Zealand Biotechnology
Popular passages
Page 86 - Comparative efficacy of Beauveria bassiana, Bacillus thuringiensis, and aldicarb for control of Colorado potato beetle in an irrigated desert agroecosystem and their effects on biodiversity.