 | Taslim Olawale Elias - 1972 - 280 pages
...part of the need to support the growing consciousness in the international community to distinguish between the obligations of a State towards the international community as a whole (erga omnes) and those arising vis-a-vis another State in the field of diplomatic protection. In a... | |
 | E. Lauterpacht - 1973 - 564 pages
...between obligations of a State towards the international community as a whole (obligations erga omnes) and those arising vis-a-vis another State in the field of diplomatic protection. The former, deriving eg from the outlawing of acts of aggression, genocide and the principles and rules... | |
 | Hermann Mosler - 1980 - 354 pages
...Court of Justice was thus quite right in drawing the essential distinction, albeit in another context, between the obligations of a State towards the international community as a whole, and those owed to a particular State. Having made this distinction, the Court said "by their very nature the... | |
 | Ingo von Münch - 1981 - 1050 pages
...Barcelona Tra et ion -Urteil traf der Gerichtshof seine inzwischen berühmtgewordene Unterscheidung "between the obligations of a State towards the international community as a whole, and those arising vis-à-vis another State in the field of diplomatic protection. By their very nature the former are... | |
 | David O'Keeffe, Henry G. Schermers - 1982 - 222 pages
...Court contrasted obligations vis-a-vis another State arising in the field of diplomatic protection with the obligations of a State towards the international Community as a whole. The latter are the concern of all States, according to the Court, and 'all States can be held to have... | |
 | B. G. Ramcharan - 1982 - 272 pages
...abstract concepts into concrete terms. 5 The International Court of Justice has drawn attention to ".. .the obligations of a State towards the international community as a whole", which are "by their very nature ... the concern of all States. In view of the importance of the rights... | |
 | Jerzy Sztucki - 1983 - 364 pages
...may have a legal interest in the respect for certain rights and obligations. The Court said: 33. ... an essential distinction should be drawn between the obligations of a State towards 5158)); Art. 10 of the Slavery Convention, 1956 (ibid. Vol. 266, p. 44 (No. 3822)); Art. 22 of the... | |
 | 476 pages
...said the following : "These obligations, however, are neither absolute nor unqualified. In particular, an essential distinction should be drawn between the...international community as a whole, and those arising vis-à-vis another State in the field of diplomatic protection. By their very nature the former are... | |
 | 1985 - 390 pages
...decision the International Court of Justice pointed out these obligations when it emphasized expressly : "An essential distinction should be drawn between...international community as a whole and those arising vis-à-vis another State in the field of diplomatic protection. By their very nature the former are... | |
 | 1984 - 384 pages
...of the International Court of Justice may be mentioned such as that in which a distinction was made "between the obligations of a State towards the international...a whole and those arising vis-a-vis another State . . .". "By their very nature," it was said, "the former are the concern of all States." "In view of... | |
| |
In particular, an essential distinction should be drawn between the obligations of a State towards the international community as a whole, and those arising vis-à-vis another State in the field of diplomatic protection. By their very nature the former... 
