Page images
PDF
EPUB

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

EIGHTY-NINTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

ON

H.R. 11256 and H.R. 11290

TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1954 WITH RESPECT TO THE RELATIVE PRIORITY AND EFFECT OF FEDERAL TAX LIENS AND LEVIES OVER THE INTEREST OF OTHER CREDITORS

MARCH 2, 1966

Printed for use of the Committee on Ways and Means

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON: 1966

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD

"American Bar Association Final Report of the Committee on Federal
Liens," approved February 23, 1959

75

Associated General Contractors of America, William E. Dunn, executive
director, letter dated February 28, 1966, to Chairman Mills..
Dunn, William E., executive director, Associated General Contractors of
America, letter dated February 28, 1966, to Chairman Mills..
Emlen, Alan L., chairman, Realtors' Washington committee, National
Association of Real Estate Boards, letter to Chairman Mills-
Gosnell, John A., general counsel, National Small Business Association,
letter dated February 28, 1966, to Chairman Mills.........

239

239

242

242

233

King, T. Bert, Washington counsel, United States Savings & Loan League,
letter dated February 28, 1966, to Chairman Mills, with attachments...
McKenna, William F., general counsel, National League of Insured Savings
Associations, letter dated March 1, 1966, to Chairman Mills

McKenzie, William A., president, National Conference on Commissioners

on Uniform State Laws, statement...

Mortgage Bankers Association of America, Samuel E. Neel, executive

vice president, statement.

236

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 1966

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS,

Washington, D.C.

The committee met at 10 a.m., pursuant to notice, in the committee room, Longworth House Office Building, Hon. Wilbur D. Mills (chairman of the committee) presiding.

The CHAIRMAN. The committee will please be in order.

The purpose of the hearing today is to receive testimony from interested public witnesses on bills to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 with respect to the relative priority effect of Federal tax liens and levies over the interest of other creditors.

Two bills in particular on the subject are H.R. 11256 which I introduced, and H.R. 11290, which was introduced by Mr. Byrnes, the ranking Republican member.

The bills generally are identical except with respect to certain language relating to liens for withheld taxes, which is a part of section 105(a) of my bill but which is not contained in Mr. Byrne's bill.

The Chair might observe that a great deal of work on this general subject has been conducted by the special committees of the American Bar Association, over a period of years, which has culminated in the bills pending before the committee.

Without objection, a copy of the press release which was issued announcing these hearings will be made a part of the record at this point.

(The press release referred to follows:)

FEBRUARY 11, 1966.

CHAIRMAN WILBUR D. MILLS, DEMOCRAT OF ARKANSAS, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, ANNOUNCES 1-DAY PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 2, 1966, ON H.R. 11256 (MILLS) AND H.R. 11290 (BYRNES OF WISCONSIN), BILLS TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE PRIORITY AND EFFECT OF FEDERAL TAX LIENS AND LEVIES

Chairman Wilbur D. Mills, Democrat of Arkansas, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, today announced that the committee would conduct a 1-day public hearing on Wednesday, March 2, 1966, on H.R. 11256 (Mills) and H.R. 11290 (Byrnes of Wisconsin), bills to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 with respect to the relative priority and effect of Federal tax liens and levies over the interest of other creditors.

It will be recalled that the chairman and Representative Byrnes introduced these bills at the request of a subcommittee of the American Bar Association on September 24, 1965, and September 27, 1965, respectively, in order to make them available to the general public as a basis for comment and study. These bills resulted from study by a subcommittee of the American Bar Association and other interested groups, in conjunction with the Treasury Department, over an extended period of time. The bills are not identical, in one principal respect, as follows:

1

« PreviousContinue »