The Torture Debate in AmericaAs a result of the work assembling the documents, memoranda, and reports that constitute the material in The Torture Papers the question of the rationale behind the Bush administration's decision to condone the use of coercive interrogation techniques in the interrogation of detainees suspected of terrorist connections was raised. The condoned use of torture in any society is questionable but its use by the United States, a liberal democracy that champions human rights and is a party to international conventions forbidding torture, has sparked an intense debate within America. The Torture Debate in America captures these arguments with essays from individuals in different discipines. This volume is divided into two sections with essays covering all sides of the argument from those who embrace absolute prohibition of torture to those who see it as a viable option in the war on terror and with documents complementing the essays. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abu Ghraib abuse acts administration advice Afghanistan al Qaeda American apply argument armed forces attack Attorney authority believe Bybee cause civilians combatants command concluded conduct Congress constitute Counsel court crimes criminal cruel death decision defense defined definition degrading Department detainees determination discussion effect enemy engaged example Executive extreme fact failed federal forces Geneva Conventions harm Human Rights individual infliction inhuman intent international law interpretation interrogation issue Justice lawyers liberal limited matter means Memo memorandum mental military moral necessity Office operations opinion organization pain or suffering party person physical political position practice President President's prevent prisoners prohibition protections punishment Qaeda question reason Report requires respect response result rules severe specific standard statute supra Taliban techniques terrorism terrorist threat tion torture treatment treaty understanding United violate
Popular passages
Page 104 - torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent...
Page 155 - Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law ; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.
Page 178 - While the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds must be borne in mind, it is the duty of States, regardless of their political, economic and cultural systems, to promote and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Page 329 - Declaration, torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted...
Page 156 - Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons, their honour, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs. They shall at all times be humanely treated, and shall be protected especially against all acts of violence or threats thereof and against insults and public curiosity.
Page 342 - Although the five techniques, as applied in combination, undoubtedly amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment, although their object was the extraction of confessions, the naming of others and/or information and although they were used systematically, they did not occasion suffering of the particular intensity and cruelty implied by the word torture as so understood.
Page 303 - ... the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.
References to this book
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Torture Debate in America |
| Editor | Karen J. Greenberg |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press, 2005 |
| ISBN | 1139447033, 9781139447034 |
| Length | 414 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |