Page images

UNEP, 1994c: UNEP Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costing Studies, Annex: Guidelines, UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark-May.

U.S. AID (Agency for International Development), 1988: Prospects in Developing Countries for Energy from Urban Solid Wastes, Bioenergy Systems Report, Office of Energy, September. (IS THIS A CHAPTER IN BIOENERGY SYSTEMS REPORT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE NAMES OF EDITORS OF THE REPORT. IF OFFICE OF ENERGY IS THE AGENCY THAT PUBLISHED THE REPORT, IS IT PART OF A , LARGER ORGANIZATION AND WHERE IS IT LOCATED?)

U.S. Department of Energy, 1991: Limiting Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States. Washington, D.C.

U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 1989: Policy Options for Stabilizing Global Climate · Report to Congress, Volume I: Chapters I-VI. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington.

U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 1990: Preliminary Technology Cost
Estimates of Measures Available to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2010,
Washington, D.C.

[blocks in formation]

U.S. EPA, 1993a: Options for Reducing Methane Emissions Internationally, Volume I: Technological Options for Reducing Methane Emissions. Report to Congress, K.B. Hogan (ed.), Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, D.C., EPA 430-R-93-006 A.

U.S. EPA, 1993b: Options for Reducing Methane Emissions Internationally, Volume II: International Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions. Report to Congress, K.B. Hogan (ed.), Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, D.C., EPA 430-R-93-006 B.

U.S. EPA, 1993c: Opportunities to Reduce Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in the United States, Report to Congress, K.B. Hogan, (ed.), Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, D.C., EPA 430-R-93-012.

U.S. EPA, 1994: International Anthropogenic Methane Emissions: Estimates for 1990. Report to Congress, M.J. Adler, ed., Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation, Washington, D.C.

van Kooten, G., L. Arthur, and W. Wilson. 1992: Potential to Sequester Carbon in Canadian Forests: Some Economic Considerations, Canadian Public Policy, 18(2), 127138.

Walker, I.O. and F. Birol, 1992: Analysing the Cost of an OPEC Environmental Tax to the Developing Countries. Energy Policy, 20, 559-67.

Walz, R., M. Schon et al., 1994: Gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkugen von
Emissiosminderungsstrategien, Study for the Enquete Commission Protecting the Earth
Atmosphere of the German Bundestag, Karlsruhe/Berlin.
Whalley, J. and R. Wigle, 1990: Cutting CO, emissions: The effects of alternative policy
approaches, The Energy Journal, 12(1), 109-24.

??White House, 1993.;

Williams, R.H., 1990: Low-Cost Strategies for Coping with CO, Emission Limits, The Energy Journal, 11(3), 35-59.

Wilson, D. and J. Swisher, 1992: Exploring the Gap: Top-down vs. Bottom-up analyses of the Cost of Mitigating Global Warming. Summer School on Science and World Affairs, Shanghai, China, August.

[blocks in formation]

Xu, D. 1994: The potential for Reducing Atmosheric Carbon by Large-Scale Afforestation in China and Related Cost/Benefit Analysis, Biomass and Bioenergy, (forthcoming). [PUBLISHED?]

??Yamaji, K., 1990: Japan, In: Carbon Emissions Control Strategies: Case Studies in International Cooperation, W.U.Chandler (Ed.), World Wildlife Fund and the Conservation Fund, Baltimore, MD, pp. 155-72.

Ybema, J.R., P.A. Okken, T. Kram, and P. Lako, 1993: CO, abatement in the Netherlands: A study following the UNEP guidelines, ECN Policy Studies, Petten (the Netherlands?).

Zachariah, K.C. and M.T. Vu, 1988: World Population Projections, 1987-1988 Edition, World Bank, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.


Energy and Environmental Analysis, IDs (CEA), under contract w Oak Ridge National Laboratory, had developed a forecast of technology penetrations in automobiles for model year 1995 in a study for the DOE conducted in 1989, and summarized in a report to DOE endtled "Domestic Mamfacturer's Fuel Economy Capability to 2000! (Decembar, 1989). The tables showing the aggregate projection for all threo domestic Manufacturers for modal yeus 1995 aré attached, wad these tables received considerable attention in the context of the wen'ongoing debates regarding changes to the CAFE regulations.

EEA had forecast that domestic manufacturers would attain 28.0 MPG in 1995 in the "product plan" case, which is the case to be referenced as no changes to CAFE regulations occurred in the loterviewing years. The forecast was prepared under an assumed fuel price for 1995 of approximately $1.40 per gallon la 1995 dollars, while actual prices we in the $1,15 range. According to the DOT, the mid-year estimate of the domestic manufacturers CAFE is 27.3 MPG, which is 0.5 MPG lower than the CAFE estimate by EEA la 1989.

A detailed review of the technology penetrations estimated for 1995 to those forecast by EEA revealed that EEA's forecasts were generally quite close to the actual 1995 penetrations. Forecast penetration of front wheel drive, 4-speed automatic transmissions, torque converter lock-up, and electronic transmission control are with 2. percent of the 1995 actuals. EEA overestimated the penctradon of overhead cam (OHC) engines and roller cam followers by about 10 percent. However, GM has improved their OHV

engines to such an extent that these engines are essentially equivalent to the OHC engines. EEA underestimated the penetration of multipoint fuel injection by over 30 percent, as tbrotte-body systems have been pbased out by muldpoint almost completely, 4-valve per cylinder engine penetration was accurately estimated by EEA, but the accompanying engino downsizing to maintain constant performance did not occur; instead, there are several models for 4-valve V-8 engines that provide 250 to 300 HP, an event not forecast by EEA

BEA did not forecast any weight reduction in the 1989-1995 time frame, but also did not forecast weight increases that have occurred recently. Most new models have significant improvements to body stiftreu in bending and wrsion, and as a result, weigh 100 to 150 lbs more than their older counterparts. Examples include the Chrysler Cirrus/Stratus, Ford Contour/Mystique and GM LeSabre/Olds 88. Indeed, the only vehicle which showed significant weight reduction in this time frame is the Chrysler Neon

The technology based ostimates of fuel economy benefit are quite close to the actual achieved levels, to within 1.5 percent. The weight increases associated with body stiffness improvements are the major reason for the difference between EFA estimates and actual 1995 CAFE, while performance and sales mix estimation error are smaller reasons. A preliminary estimate suggests that performance increase caused a 0.7 MPG loss rather than 0.6 forecast, while sales mix shifts caused a 1.5 MPPG loss, rather than the 1.4 MPG forecast. The additional 0.3 MPG loss is associated with the changes to body stiffness, for a total reduction of 0.3 MPG.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Front Wheel Drivo
Drag Reduction
4-speed Automado Trans
Torque Converter

Electronic Transmissdon

Accessory Improvements

Engine Improvements
• Advanced Pusbrod (AOHV
. O'rhd Cam (Over AOHV)
• Roller Cam Followers
· Low Friction

Pistons Rings . Throttle Body FI

Multi-point FI

[blocks in formation]

(over throttle body)
4 valves per cylinder engine
. 4 cyl replacing 6
.6 cyl replacing 8"
Total F/E Benefit (%)



18 12

1:44 -..0.96


Number in parenthesis for advanced pushrod indicates 45 percent of pusbrod engines replaced by OHC engines. NM: Not meaningful

Drag reduction for large/luxiry cars from Co - 0.42 baseline.

1987 distribudon: 20.5% V-8, 29.5% V-6, 50% 4 cylinder.

« PreviousContinue »