Table 18. Comparison of Major Program Categories for Work Proposed *Many of the applicants and grantees included more than one Specific Topics. On pages 12 and 13 of this report is a discussion of the single subjects selected for study in the 839 proposals and a rationale for their choice. Table 7 (page 14) summarizes information regarding these topics by agency type. Table 19 (page 25) reports the same information for the funded projects. Table 20 (page 26) reports the comparative data. While the same conclusions can be drawn regarding the funded program as pertained to the applicants (1.e., that credit and savings and legal rights, redress, and consumer law appear with the greatest frequency; that the next ranking topics are food and housing), other subjects appear to move into relatively more prominent positions. The consumer role in protection equals interest in improving buying practices for housing; and budgeting equals improving buying practices for food. These relationships may be a function of the orientations and competencies of the types of agencies funded, especially in the case of the budgeting-food similarity. Without statistical treatment of the data, however, this can only be reported as a "hunch." Additionally, health services (including medicare/medicaid), transportation, and the consumer issue of advertising and promotion appear with proportionately greater frequency in the grantee program. Of a smaller dimension is the suggestion that the funded program places greater importance on energy consumption and conservation and utilities. Some of the single topics that commanded only minor attention among the applicants moved to stronger positions in the funded program. Specific Topics, by Major Program Categories and by Types Of Agencies Receiving Grants, Office of Consumers' Education, Fiscal Year 1976. SEA LEA IHE OPPNA TOTAL Number* SEA LEA IHE Percentage OPPNA TOTAL Table 19. 0 1 1 0 65666 22242 Product Safety, Health Hazards, Pollution 1 Legal Rights, Redress, Consumer Law 3 Consumer Role in Protection 3 253 10 *Many of the 66 projects include more than one specific topic. **Excluding Health Insurance. Table 20. Comparison of Specific Topics for Work Proposed by Applicants and Grantees, Office of Consumers' Education, Fiscal Year 1976. *Many of the applicants and grantees included more than one specific topic. **Excluding Health Insurance. The factual information and generalizations appearing in this report were developed through analysis of the 1976 grant applications received by the Office of Consumers' Education, Office of Education. This compilation sets forth the data and some insights regarding program interests, but is not a complete interpretation of all information collected. From time to time additional interpretive statements are contemplated, with priority going to the special programming needs of selected target groups and emerging consumer issues. For further information, contact: Office of Consumers' Education Office of Education Regional Office Building 3, Room 5624 Washington, D.C. 20202 Telephone: Area Code 202/245-0636 Due to restraints of time, we were not able We would like to have the responses no later Thank you very much. CDP: jk Sincerely, Carl D. Perkins |