Trade in Food: Regulatory and Judicial Approaches in the EC and the WTOTrade in Food surveys and explores the evolution of the European Community's regulation of food within the broader framework set out by the WTO Agreements. Its main purpose is to provide readers keen to deepen their knowledge of the field with easy access to the EC and WTO food laws accompanied by a critical explanation and commentary. The book is suitable for legal practitioners, judges, policy-makers, officials of international organizations as well as post graduate students of international trade law and policy, international and European economic law, global administrative law and risk regulation. |
From inside the book
Page 9
The EC and Scientific Justification 297 1.1 The Origins 298 1.2 The Codification of the Scientific Justification Requirements: from Scientific Evidence to Risk Assessment 302 1.3 The Use of scientific Evidence within the EC 304 1.4 ...
The EC and Scientific Justification 297 1.1 The Origins 298 1.2 The Codification of the Scientific Justification Requirements: from Scientific Evidence to Risk Assessment 302 1.3 The Use of scientific Evidence within the EC 304 1.4 ...
Page 16
This original approach is justified by the comprehensiveness of the SPS Agreement, which relies moreover on various international standards as an indirect tool for harmonising national regulations in certain respects.
This original approach is justified by the comprehensiveness of the SPS Agreement, which relies moreover on various international standards as an indirect tool for harmonising national regulations in certain respects.
Page 23
In this introductory chapter, which defines the scope and the structure of the research (C), a justification for such an attempted comparison will be provided, together with its underlying methodology (B).
In this introductory chapter, which defines the scope and the structure of the research (C), a justification for such an attempted comparison will be provided, together with its underlying methodology (B).
Page 37
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 40
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
IX | 33 |
X | 51 |
XI | 53 |
XII | 61 |
XIII | 71 |
XIV | 73 |
XV | 161 |
XVII | 169 |
XXXVIII | 293 |
XXXIX | 297 |
XL | 307 |
XLI | 313 |
XLII | 317 |
XLIII | 319 |
XLIV | 332 |
XLV | 346 |
XVIII | 173 |
XIX | 183 |
XX | 210 |
XXI | 216 |
XXII | 222 |
XXIII | 225 |
XXIV | 227 |
XXV | 231 |
XXVI | 234 |
XXVII | 239 |
XXVIII | 241 |
XXIX | 242 |
XXX | 244 |
XXXI | 258 |
XXXII | 274 |
XXXIII | 275 |
XXXIV | 280 |
XXXV | 289 |
XXXVI | 290 |
XXXVII | 291 |
Common terms and phrases
adopted Animal Health Appellate Body application approach appropriate Article 2.2 Article 5.7 assessment and risk Codex Alimentarius Codex Alimentarius Commission Commission consumer contested measure contracting party Council decision developed dispute EC courts EC food EC institutions EC–Hormones EFSA EFSA’s ensure environmental established European Food Safety European Parliament food law food regulation foodstuffs framework GATT genetically modified organisms GMOs guidelines harmonisation Hormones human health internal market international standards international trade issues judicial review justified legislation level of protection organisations Panel Report paragraph particular Pfizer phytosanitary measures precautionary principle procedures public health regime regulatory rely requirements risk analysis model risk assessment risk management role sanitary and phytosanitary sanitary or phytosanitary science-based measures scientific committees scientific evidence scientific justification scientific opinions scientific uncertainty specific SPS Agreement SPS measures standard of review supra note Treaty World Trade World Trade Organization WTO judicial bodies WTO members